[gpc-informatics] Batch modify: #133, #256, #263

Batch modification to #133, #256, #263 by dconnolly: priority to minor Comment: technical work on milestone:adaptable-accrual is on the back-burner pending governance (#276) -- Tickets URL: gpc-informatics

Re: [gpc-informatics] #266: CDM V3 Development for Phase 2

#266: CDM V3 Development for Phase 2 --+ Reporter: campbell | Owner: preeder Type: design-issue | Status: assigned Priority: minor | Milestone: adaptable-accrual Component: data-stds | Resolution:

Re: [gpc-informatics] #270: Port Q1 QA query to Oracle

#270: Port Q1 QA query to Oracle --+ Reporter: dconnolly | Owner: mikemunns Type: enhancement | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: data-quality3 Component: data-sharing | Resolution: wontfix Ke

Re: [gpc-informatics] #158: usable view of LOINC lab terms

#158: usable view of LOINC lab terms -+ Reporter: rwaitman | Owner: dconnolly Type: enhancement | Status: accepted Priority: major| Milestone: data-domains3 Component: data-stds| Resolution: Keywords:

RE: [gpc-informatics] #281: performance of Q1 QA query on non-Neteeza systems

I think it took about 30 min on single instance Oracle 12c here, definitely a matter of minutes not hours. UTHSCSA QA query v6 https://bitbucket.org/njgraham/pcori-qa/src/7ce69cfb8f37/Q1_2015_Quality_Query_v6.sql?at=uthscsa Which is a modified version from this branch https://bitbucket.org/njg

Re: [gpc-informatics] #281: performance of Q1 QA query on non-Neteeza systems

Besides KUMC, did anyone else happen to note how long the query took to run at each site? I'd especially love to hear from MCW with their postges site. -TM On 4/28/2015 7:50 AM, GPC Informatics wrote: #281: performance of Q1 QA query on non-Neteeza systems --+