RE: future dates table in CDM refresh Table IIIA

Debbie We were running at 3.1% future dates for prescription end dates and I agree that the data check seems inappropriate. Prescription Start dates however, would seem more reasonable as a data quality indicator from a clinical viewpoint at least. Jim From: Gpc-dev

RE: [gpc-informatics] #280: Medication ontology orgainzed by ingredient

Jeff/All, It looks like we were missing an index on the UNMC table - try now? Initial manual testing shows that it's a lot faster (the UNMC hierarchy anyway). See also https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/568#comment:11. -- Nathan -Original Message- From: Gpc-dev

RE: future dates table in CDM refresh Table IIIA

I don't know, but the CDM folks responded right away last time I raised an issue in the PCORnet GitHub CDM Forum on github. https://github.com/CDMFORUM/CDM-ERRATA/issues/19 -- Dan From: Gpc-dev [gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu]

future dates table in CDM refresh Table IIIA

Anyone know why are start and end future dates flagged for prescriptions? I think there would be legitimate reasons why start and end future dates may occur for prescriptions. Maybe for less than the 5% threshold, but nonetheless, there would be legitimate reasons. We were not near the 5%

gpc-dev 17 Apr agenda and meeting notes

What else for tomorrow? * ​18 Apr gpc-dev shared notes; scribe: MCW 1. Convene, take roll, review records and plan next meeting(s) * 11:00am Central Time.

RE: UW Madison's r004 approved

Declaring victory in mail to gpc-dev seems to be an established pattern for these. It works for me. Congrats! But if you looked for a relevant ticket in last week's call notes without finding one, you didn't look very hard :) *

FW: UW Madison's r004 approved

Was this being tracked somewhere other than in the GPC-DEV notes? I looked at the latest minutes and didn’t see an obvious ticket to amend. -TM From: Debbie Yoshihara Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 11:39 AM To: Thomas Mish ; Steger Donald A ; Konkol Anthony

Re: [gpc-informatics] #580: Data Characterization - Cycle 2, Refresh 2 Tracking

#580: Data Characterization - Cycle 2, Refresh 2 Tracking ---+ Reporter: lv | Owner: bernocchi Type: problem| Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: cdm-c2r2 Component: data-stds |

Re: [gpc-informatics] #478: ADAPTABLE monitoring

#478: ADAPTABLE monitoring --+ Reporter: schandaka | Owner: schandaka Type: enhancement | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: adaptable-monitor Component: data-sharing | Resolution:

Re: [gpc-informatics] #580: Data Characterization - Cycle 2, Refresh 2 Tracking

#580: Data Characterization - Cycle 2, Refresh 2 Tracking ---+- Reporter: lv | Owner: preeder Type: problem| Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: cdm-cycle3 Component: data-stds |

Fwd: U of Nebraska's r004 approved

Great news Nebraska! Russ Waitman Begin forwarded message: From: PCORnet DRN OC > Date: April 17, 2017 at 7:45:50 AM CDT To: "Campbell, James R" >,