Phillip,
I noticed in both your and KUMC's ontology with RXNORM, there are no
leaf nodes, or should I say, what I think of as leaf nodes are labled FA -
so Folders.
Once you get down to the MED_ID in KUMC's case, and the RXCUI in
UTSW's case, why do you still have it as a Folder instead of
I downloaded Phillip Reeder's gpc_terms.zip and did a cursory check on the
RXNORM ontology portion. I discusssed a few things with him and I'll share
with the entire gpc-dev group what we discussed.
Phillip's ontology did not have the "root" 3149154 in the paths but it is still
in the
Hi Nathan,
Yes, I've seen that, I'm just wondering, if there is no STANDARD way of
finding these values,
then maybe it's a manual count.
Thanks!
Debbie
From: Nathan Graham [mailto:ngra...@kumc.edu]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 9:17 AM
To: Deborah Yoshihara; gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu
Cc: Van
Hi folks,
For the PCORI May 2015 enrollment task, Wisconsin did not have
Biophysiological data, clinical notes, or biospecimens in I2B2.
Do any of you have this data and what do your queries look like?
We only have one registry, the tumor registry, so even though it's in
I2B2, I didn't do
There is no ETA for WISC because it has not passed IRB approval.
-Original Message-
From: gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu
[mailto:gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu] On Behalf Of Dan Connolly
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 11:08 AM
To: gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu; Tamara McMahon;
Dan,
We're going to concentrate on 4 things to implement in the gpc ontology
structure:
1) demographics/vitals
2) diagnosis
3) tumor registry
4) meds if time
--- Debbie Yoshihara
University of Wisconsin
___
Gpc-dev mailing list
