raham; campb...@unmc.edu
> Subject: RE: [gpc-informatics] #109: mapping to PCORI CDM (aka mini-
> sentinel data model)
>
> Hi Men,
>
> I think the next step is to have these decisions reality tested with a
> true set of demo data that could be realistically ETL'd into i2
in word.split('_'))
>'HumptyDumpty'
>
>Did you add spaces back in manually?
>
>More on steps b, c, and d separately...
>
>
>--
>Dan
>
>
>From: Klann, Jeffrey G. [jeff.kl...@mgh.harvard.edu]
>Sent: Mond
t;From: Klann, Jeffrey G. [jeff.kl...@mgh.harvard.edu]
>Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 10:23 PM
>To: gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu; Russ Waitman; Dan Connolly
>Cc: Matthew Hoag; Nathan Graham; campb...@unmc.edu; Murphy, Shawn N.
>Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #109: mapping to PCORI CDM (aka
>mini
ck in manually?
More on steps b, c, and d separately...
--
Dan
From: Klann, Jeffrey G. [jeff.kl...@mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 10:23 PM
To: gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu; Russ Waitman; Dan Connolly
Cc: Matthew Hoag; Nathan Graham; campb...@un
Hi Dan,
Some comments:
On A - I agree, we¹re nearing a workable ontology. Per our discussion
today, I gather that query compatibility across our networks is of utmost
importance. So we need to synchronize our fullnames and basecodes in the
PCORnet ontology. I started looking at differences betwee
> > BUG: Modifiers get the same table name and column name as concepts.
>
> I don't understand that one. I'll have to follow up for details.
i2b2 is flexible, but generally for modifiers the c_tablename column is
ŒMODIFIER_DIMENSION¹ and the c_columname is Œmodifier_path¹.
>
> > BUG: Need to rem
