RE: encryption at rest?

2014-10-27 Thread Dan Connolly
are expected to apply best practices for data security as they see fit, as usual. -- Dan From: Dan Connolly Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 10:50 AM To: Verhagen, Laurel A Cc: gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu Subject: RE: encryption at rest? It's different from my

Re: encryption at rest? (all data in motion)

2014-10-27 Thread Alex Bokov
Identified patient information specifically? Or de-identified also? If de-identified, this implies that all I2B2 instances (and any other services that use the data warehouses) use SSL. Which is not a bad idea, but we need to be sure everyone understands this. On 10/27/2014 05:36 PM, Dan

Re: encryption at rest?

2014-10-21 Thread Alex Bokov
On 10/21/2014 09:52 AM, Verhagen, Laurel A wrote: After writing the agenda, I received the following from Steve Fennel: 1)How will GPC data in motion be protected? /All data in motion will be encrypted. Specially, data files will be sent via SCP. Alternatively, if the application involves

RE: encryption at rest?

2014-10-21 Thread Dan Connolly
Which direction is that? pointer, please? -- Dan From: Verhagen, Laurel A [verhagen.lau...@mcrf.mfldclin.edu] Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 10:21 AM To: Dan Connolly Cc: gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu Subject: RE: encryption at rest? Direction was that gpc hosted

RE: encryption at rest?

2014-10-21 Thread Verhagen, Laurel A
Subject: RE: encryption at rest? Which direction is that? pointer, please? -- Dan From: Verhagen, Laurel A [verhagen.lau...@mcrf.mfldclin.edu] Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 10:21 AM To: Dan Connolly Cc: gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edumailto:gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu Subject