Re: [gpfsug-discuss] LROC

2016-12-28 Thread Aaron Knister
Interesting. Would you be willing to post the output of "mmlssnsd -X | grep 0A6403AA58641546" from the troublesome node as suggested by Sven? On 12/28/16 5:39 PM, Matt Weil wrote: mmdiag --version === mmdiag: version === Current GPFS build: "4.2.1.2 ". Built on Oct 27 2016 at 10:52:12

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] LROC

2016-12-28 Thread Matt Weil
> mmdiag --version > > === mmdiag: version === > Current GPFS build: "4.2.1.2 ". > Built on Oct 27 2016 at 10:52:12 > Running 13 minutes 54 secs, pid 13229 On 12/28/16 4:26 PM, Knister, Aaron S. (GSFC-606.2)[COMPUTER SCIENCE CORP] wrote: > Ouch...to quote Adam Savage "well there's yer problem".

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] LROC

2016-12-28 Thread Knister, Aaron S. (GSFC-606.2)[COMPUTER SCIENCE CORP]
Ouch...to quote Adam Savage "well there's yer problem". Are you perhaps running a version of GPFS 4.1 older than 4.1.1.9? Looks like there was an LROC related assert fixed in 4.1.1.9 but I can't find details on it. From: Matt Weil Sent: 12/28/16, 5:21 PM To: gpfsug main discussion list

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] LROC

2016-12-28 Thread Matt Weil
yes > Wed Dec 28 16:17:07.507 2016: [X] *** Assert exp(ssd->state != > ssdActive) in line 427 of file > /project/sprelbmd1/build/rbmd11027d/src/avs/fs/mmfs/ts/flea/fs_agent_gpfs.C > Wed Dec 28 16:17:07.508 2016: [E] *** Traceback: > Wed Dec 28 16:17:07.509 2016: [E] 2:0x7FF1604F39B5 >