Re: [gpfsug-discuss] subblock sanity check in 5.0

2018-06-25 Thread Felipe Knop
Joey, The subblocks-per-full-block value cannot be specified when the file system is created, but is rather computed automatically by GPFS. In file systems with format older than 5.0, the value is fixed at 32. For file systems with format 5.0.0 or later, the value is computed based on the block

[gpfsug-discuss] subblock sanity check in 5.0

2018-06-25 Thread Joseph Mendoza
Quick question, anyone know why GPFS wouldn't respect the default for the subblocks-per-full-block parameter when creating a new filesystem?  I'd expect it to be set to 512 for an 8MB block size but my guess is that also specifying a metadata-block-size is interfering with it (by being too small). 

[gpfsug-discuss] mmchconfig subnets

2018-06-25 Thread Eric Horst
Hi, I'm hoping somebody has insights into how the subnets option actually works. I've read the docs a dozen times and I want to make sure I understand before I take my production cluster down to make the changes. On the current cluster the daemon addresses are on a gpfs private network and the

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] mmapplypolicy on nested filesets ...

2018-06-25 Thread Jaime Pinto
It took a while before I could get back to this issue, but I want to confirm that Marc's suggestions worked line a charm, and did exactly what I hoped for: * remove any FOR FILESET(...) specifications * mmapplypolicy /path/to/the/root/directory/of/the/independent-fileset-you-wish-to-scan

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] mmbackup issue

2018-06-25 Thread Grunenberg, Renar
Hallo All, here the requirement for enhancement of mmbackup. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe_ID=121687 Please vote. Renar Grunenberg Abteilung Informatik – Betrieb HUK-COBURG Bahnhofsplatz 96444 Coburg Telefon: 09561 96-44110 Telefax: 09561 96-44104 E-Mail: