Hello Rob,
We looked at AFM years ago for DR, but after reading the bug reports, we
avoided it, and also have had seen a case where it had to be removed from one
customer, so we have kept things simple. Now looking again a few years later
there are still issues, IBM Spectrum Scale Active File
Hello, It is great, that RHEL 7.8 is supported on SS 4.2.3.22, when will RHEL
8.x be supported on GPFS SS 4.2.3.X?? Thanks, Dean
From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
On Behalf Of Carl Zetie -
ca...@us.ibm.com
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 2:21 PM
To: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org
Hello Carl,
Thanks for the clarification. I have always heard the term "existing customers"
so originally I thought we were fine, but this is the first time I have seen
the term "existing systems". However, it seems what I said before is mostly
correct, eventually all customers will be forced
Hello Carl,
Yes, for existing IBM direct customers that may have been the case for v4 to
v5. However, from my understanding if a customer bought GPFS/SS via DDN,
Lenovo, etc. with embedded systems licenses, this is not the case. From my
understanding existing customers from DDN, Lenovo, etc.
Hello All,
As IBM has completely switched to capacity based licensing in order to use SS
v5 I was wondering how others are dealing with this? We do not find the
capacity based licensing sustainable. Our long term plan is to migrate away
from SS v5 to Lustre, and based on the Lustre roadmap we
