Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Default placement/External Pool

2017-11-08 Thread Rob Basham
Peter, Yes, you'll need to run your migration policy from a Cloud Services node. Regards, Rob BashamMCStore and IBM Ready Archive architecture971-344-1999     - Original message -From: "Chase, Peter" Sent by: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.orgTo: "'gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org'" C

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Default placement/External Pool

2017-11-08 Thread Marc A Kaplan
gged with <5> are from node n4. <5> sh: /tmp/mynodes.sh: No such file or directory <5> [E:127] Error on system(/tmp/mynodes.sh TEST '/foo/bar5' 2>&1) <5> [W] EXEC '/tmp/mynodes.sh' of EXTERNAL POOL or LIST 'x' fails TEST with code 127 on t

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Default placement/External Pool

2017-11-08 Thread Oesterlin, Robert
Hi Peter mmapplypolicy has a "-N" parameter that should restrict it to a subset of nodes or node class if you define that. -N {all | mount | Node[,Node...] | NodeFile | NodeClass} Specifies the list of nodes that will run parallel instances of policy code in the GPFS home clust

[gpfsug-discuss] Default placement/External Pool

2017-11-08 Thread Chase, Peter
Hello! A follow up to my previous question about automatically sending files to Amazon s3 as they arrive in GPFS. I have created an interface script to manage Amazon s3 storage as an external pool, I have created a migration policy that pre-migrates all files to the external pool and I have se