Re: [gpfsug-discuss] WAS: alternative path; Now: RDMA

2021-12-13 Thread Jonathan Buzzard
On 13/12/2021 00:03, Andrew Beattie wrote: What is the main outcome or business requirement of the teaching cluster ( i notice your specific in the use of defining it as a teaching cluster) It is entirely possible that the use case for this cluster does not warrant the use of high speed low lat

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] WAS: alternative path; Now: RDMA

2021-12-12 Thread Andrew Beattie
Jonathan,   What is the main outcome or business requirement of the teaching cluster ( i notice your specific in the use of defining it as a teaching cluster) It is entirely possible that the use case for this cluster does not warrant the use of high speed low latency networking, and it simply need

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] WAS: alternative path; Now: RDMA

2021-12-12 Thread Alec
So I never said this node wasn't in a HPC Cluster, it has partners... For our use case however some nodes have very expensive per core software licensing, and we have to weigh the human costs of empowering traditional monolithic code to do the job, or bringing in more users to re-write and maintai

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] WAS: alternative path; Now: RDMA

2021-12-12 Thread Jonathan Buzzard
On 12/12/2021 02:19, Alec wrote: I feel the need to respond here... I see many responses on this User Group forum that are dismissive of the fringe / extreme use cases and of the "what do you need that for '' mindset. The thing is that Spectrum Scale is for the extreme, just take the word "Par

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] WAS: alternative path; Now: RDMA

2021-12-11 Thread Alec
I feel the need to respond here... I see many responses on this User Group forum that are dismissive of the fringe / extreme use cases and of the "what do you need that for '' mindset. The thing is that Spectrum Scale is for the extreme, just take the word "Parallel" in the old moniker that was a

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] WAS: alternative path; Now: RDMA

2021-12-10 Thread Grunenberg, Renar
o: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org> Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] WAS: alternative path; Now: RDMA Jonathan: You posed a reasonable question, which was "when is RDMA worth the hassle?" I agree with part of your premises, which is that it only matters whe

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] WAS: alternative path; Now: RDMA

2021-12-10 Thread Walter Sklenka
this time ... ) Best regards Walter From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org On Behalf Of Douglas O'flaherty Sent: Freitag, 10. Dezember 2021 05:24 To: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] WAS: alternative path; Now: RDMA Jonathan: You posed a reasonable

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] WAS: alternative path; Now: RDMA

2021-12-09 Thread Douglas O'flaherty
Jonathan: You posed a reasonable question, which was "when is RDMA worth the hassle?" I agree with part of your premises, which is that it only matters when the bottleneck isn't somewhere else. With a parallel file system, like Scale/GPFS, the absolute performance bottleneck is not the throug