On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Michael updated the patch to conform to core gPXE coding style and applied
> it to his repo:
>
> https://git.ipxe.org/ipxe.git/commitdiff/75333f464e9f7c810a9c756b0553a02dbcb39d57
>
> Are you happy for the updated patch to be merged into mai
How about hooking INT18 for those people? I know IBM BIOS behaves much more
like a BBS system in capability if INT18 is hooked. Still has to turn off
the prompt, but while you are looking at it...
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Miller, Shao
wrote:
> Please disregard this patch as it contains
Please disregard this patch as it contains an error. A new patch will
be forthcoming, along with associated branch updates. *sigh* - Shao
___
gPXE-devel mailing list
gPXE-devel@etherboot.org
http://etherboot.org/mailman/listinfo/gpxe-devel
Michael updated the patch to conform to core gPXE coding style and applied
it to his repo:
https://git.ipxe.org/ipxe.git/commitdiff/75333f464e9f7c810a9c756b0553a02dbcb39d57
Are you happy for the updated patch to be merged into mainline?
Stefan
On 4 Jun 2010 20:42, "Faur Andrei" wrote:
Hello,
I think Piotr and you hit the jme 64-bit format string issue and wrote
a patch too. Your patch isn't in mainline and unless you have a
larger patch ready to go anyway I think we should merge Geoff's fix.
Does that sound okay?
Stefan
___
gPXE-devel maili
