Re: [graph-tool] Questions about PPBlockState

2020-07-03 Thread Tiago de Paula Peixoto
Am 03.07.20 um 20:17 schrieb Davide Cittaro: > Would it make sense to get a graph from partitions (where edges are weighted > on connectivity among them) and apply NSBM then? This would produce a mixed > model where the deepest level is actually a PP, and the hierarchy doesn't > assume any

Re: [graph-tool] Questions about PPBlockState

2020-07-03 Thread Davide Cittaro
Hi Tiago, > On 3 Jul 2020, at 19:05, Tiago de Paula Peixoto wrote: > > Hi Davide, > > Am 03.07.20 um 11:31 schrieb Davide Cittaro: >> Hello, >> I'm testing the new Planted Partition model in graph-tool on my data, indeed >> I'm finding interesting results. I have some

Re: [graph-tool] Questions about PPBlockState

2020-07-03 Thread Tiago de Paula Peixoto
Hi Davide, Am 03.07.20 um 11:31 schrieb Davide Cittaro: > Hello, > I'm testing the new Planted Partition model in graph-tool on my data, indeed > I'm finding interesting results. I have some questions/observations, though. > - PPBlockState returns a relatively large number of partitions on

[graph-tool] Questions about PPBlockState

2020-07-03 Thread Davide Cittaro
Hello, I'm testing the new Planted Partition model in graph-tool on my data, indeed I'm finding interesting results. I have some questions/observations, though. - PPBlockState returns a relatively large number of partitions on large networks, which is fine and expected. When I use NSBM,