Thanks
On 15 Jun 2020, at 16:34, Tiago de Paula Peixoto
mailto:ti...@skewed.de>> wrote:
Am 15.06.20 um 16:45 schrieb James Ruffle:
Tiago,
I’m sorry that you feel that my code to use the graph_union with intersection,
following which to remove parallel edges, then call Graph.copy_property on t
Am 15.06.20 um 16:45 schrieb James Ruffle:
> Tiago,
>
> I’m sorry that you feel that my code to use the graph_union with
> intersection, following which to remove parallel edges, then call
> Graph.copy_property on the union graph, did not follow your instructions
> which, as far as I can read,
Tiago,
I’m sorry that you feel that my code to use the graph_union with intersection,
following which to remove parallel edges, then call Graph.copy_property on the
union graph, did not follow your instructions which, as far as I can read,
specifically asked I use all of those and in that order
Am 15.06.20 um 15:52 schrieb James Ruffle:
> Thanks for the suggestion Tiago. Unfortunately, it is resulting in the
> same issue for me.
>
> In extension to the previous example:
> ug = gt.graph_union(g,u,intersection=u.vertex_index,internal_props=True)
> gt.remove_parallel_edges(ug)
> print(ug)
>
Thanks for the suggestion Tiago. Unfortunately, it is resulting in the same
issue for me.
In extension to the previous example:
ug = gt.graph_union(g,u,intersection=u.vertex_index,internal_props=True)
gt.remove_parallel_edges(ug)
print(ug)
print(g.vp.label[0])
#Myriel
print(ug.vp.label[0])
#’ ‘
Am 15.06.20 um 14:20 schrieb James Ruffle:
> It seemed reasonable that one might want to review the results of a
> MixedMeasuredBlockState with respect to the original graph. For instance,
> perhaps I have certain vertex or edge properties within my original graph
> object I want to review for a
Hi Tiago,
It seemed reasonable that one might want to review the results of a
MixedMeasuredBlockState with respect to the original graph. For instance,
perhaps I have certain vertex or edge properties within my original graph
object I want to review for association to this model's collected epr
Am 15.06.20 um 13:36 schrieb James Ruffle:
> How do you manage to get around this issue? Presumably there is a
> simpler way with the graph-tool syntax than forlooping everything and
> matching edges up between the two graphs…?
Obviously, the reconstructed graph is different from what has been
mea
Dear Tiago,
Thank you for your reply, this is really helpful and I think that the
MixedMeasuredBlockState is just what I need. I would like to run the
MixedMeasuredBlockState, collect the marginals and then store these as an edge
property on the original graph for later analysis with my other v
Dear James,
This is a very involved question, and it's a bit difficult to get to the
bottom of what you want.
I'll start with the last question, which I think can be addressed more
directly:
Am 03.06.20 um 20:35 schrieb James Ruffle:
> Alternatively, do you have any suggestions on how I would ac
Dear Tiago / Graph Tool community,
I am running the SBM on a directed network where edges are all conditional
probability of one event, given the other, approximately 60 nodes.
This is generated originally from a binary matrix of repeated samples and if
these 60 nodes as variables occurred or d
11 matches
Mail list logo
