Re: [OpenJDK Rasterizer] Rasterizer replacement proposal

2007-06-22 Thread Roman Kennke
Hi, > FYI, the build containing Jim's changes for >the puggable rasterizer is finally out (see attached >email). Yeah cool. I've already checked it out. I'll try to address Jim's 'complaints' as soon as possible. Unfortunately, the legal side of the story doesn't seem to pan out as easi

Re: [OpenJDK Rasterizer] Rasterizer replacement proposal

2007-06-18 Thread Roman Kennke
ternate implementation of line > widening... Yeah, my implementation relies on BasicStroke for that. Too bad. I haven't really looked into the geometry of that path stuff. How's the read-only HG and/or SVN workspace for Java2D going? /Roman -- Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Roman Kennke, S

Re: [OpenJDK Rasterizer] Rasterizer replacement proposal

2007-06-13 Thread Roman Kennke
public, but we want to do whatever we can to > facilitate collaborative development even prior to the full Mercurial > changeover. Great! Thanks for going through this. /Roman -- Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Roman Kennke, Software Engineer, http://kennke.org aicas Allerton Interworks Computer Automated

Re: [OpenJDK Rasterizer] Rasterizer replacement proposal

2007-06-12 Thread Roman Kennke
es it is a good learning exercide trying to defend 'the other side' ;-) /Roman -- Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Roman Kennke, Software Engineer, http://kennke.org aicas Allerton Interworks Computer Automated Systems GmbH Haid-und-Neu-Straße 18 * D-76131 Karlsruhe * Germany http://www.aicas.com

Re: [OpenJDK Rasterizer] Rasterizer replacement proposal

2007-06-12 Thread Roman Kennke
me to go through the copyright grantback procedure for the couple of files in question. And the end result of these discussions isn't clear either (although I hope it will turn out to be good). /Roman -- Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Roman Kennke, Software Engineer, http://kennke.org aicas Allerton I

Re: [OpenJDK Rasterizer] Rasterizer replacement proposal

2007-06-12 Thread Roman Kennke
t; >>to fix - we can include you as a reviewer in relevant > >>code changes (the system is email and web-based). > > > The rush (it was a close thing even if that's not apparent) > to get the source launched for JavaOne meant that we are nowhere >

Re: [OpenJDK Rasterizer] Rasterizer replacement proposal

2007-06-12 Thread Roman Kennke
en maybe only to group members, > > but then comes the question, how can anybody become a group member?). > >I'll see if we could arrange that. I believe that it is our >intention anyway - once we move to Mercurial each "group" will have >their read/write mercur

Re: [OpenJDK Rasterizer] Rasterizer replacement proposal

2007-06-12 Thread Roman Kennke
ther with the ductus library, to be able to test and compare alternate implementations for correctness, precision and performance. Regards, Roman -- Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Roman Kennke, Software Engineer, http://kennke.org aicas Allerton Interworks Computer Automated Systems GmbH Haid-und-Neu-Straße

Re: [OpenJDK Rasterizer] Rasterizer replacement proposal

2007-06-08 Thread Roman Kennke
Hi there, > Thanks for this. Jim Graham is the best person to comment > on this but he's on vacation until next week some time. I'm also back from my honeymoon vacation now. Has anybody had the time to review my rasterizer yet? /Roman -- Dipl.-Inf. Roman Kennke, Softwar

[OpenJDK Rasterizer] Rasterizer replacement proposal

2007-05-24 Thread Roman Kennke
complex shapes). I will still be around tomorrow, and starting from saturday I will be offline for 2 weeks (or, at best be online sporadically) because I'm going to marry, yay! If you have urgent questions it's a good idea to ask them ASAP. Otherwise, I'll be curious to hear your opin