Re: [GRASS-dev] libgis: ERROR: Unable to make mapset element cell_misc/...

2009-03-07 Thread Markus Neteler
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Glynn Clements gl...@gclements.plus.com wrote: Markus Neteler wrote: access() sets errno when it fails. If you want the reason why mkdir() failed, you need to test the return value from G_mkdir(), e.g.: ... Or is a second try to access unavoidable? It

[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #519: osgeo4w build

2009-03-07 Thread GRASS GIS
#519: osgeo4w build --+- Reporter: jef | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: task | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: 6.4.0

[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #519: osgeo4w build

2009-03-07 Thread GRASS GIS
#519: osgeo4w build --+- Reporter: jef | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: task | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: 6.4.0

[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #523: wxGUI: querying a vector map in edit mode does nothing

2009-03-07 Thread GRASS GIS
#523: wxGUI: querying a vector map in edit mode does nothing --+- Reporter: msieczka | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: defect| Status: new Priority: major |

Re: [GRASS-dev] running v.surf.rst from GUI

2009-03-07 Thread Helena Mitasova
Markus, thanks for getting back to me on this, v.surf.rst runs fine from the tcltk gui, it but has several problems in wxpython gui (this is for today's update of grass65): 1. It is really hard to find where to put the name of the main output elevation - it is not under tab outputs but

Re: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #518: negative flow accumulation with r.watershed SFD or MFD

2009-03-07 Thread Helena Mitasova
There is no question that the default should be kept negative, although checking whether the result is correct would not hurt - we can look at it with our Panama experiments, others using r.watershed could provide some helpful feedback too. But adding a flag to keep values positive actually

Re: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #518: negative flow accumulation with r.watershed SFD or MFD

2009-03-07 Thread Michael Barton
On Mar 7, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Helena Mitasova wrote: There is no question that the default should be kept negative, although checking whether the result is correct would not hurt - we can look at it with our Panama experiments, others using r.watershed could provide some helpful feedback

Re: [GRASS-dev] running v.surf.rst from GUI

2009-03-07 Thread Michael Barton
On Mar 7, 2009, at 11:05 PM, grass-dev-requ...@lists.osgeo.org wrote: Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 07:05:07 +0100 From: Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] running v.surf.rst from GUI To: Helena Mitasova hmit...@unity.ncsu.edu Cc: GRASS developers list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org

Re: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #518: negative flow accumulation with r.watershed SFD or MFD

2009-03-07 Thread Markus Metz
Michael Barton wrote: On Mar 7, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Helena Mitasova wrote: There is no question that the default should be kept negative, although checking whether the result is correct would not hurt - we can look at it with our Panama experiments, others using r.watershed could provide

Re: [GRASS-dev] running v.surf.rst from GUI

2009-03-07 Thread Markus Neteler
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote: ... I also don't see it. Seems to disappear somewhere. in the Tcl GUI it's present. I think that there is a bug for all parameters not having guisection defined. They should go into the Optional tab but they don't (they