[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #397: v.clean creates polygons instead of holes

2009-04-14 Thread GRASS GIS
#397: v.clean creates polygons instead of holes --+- Reporter: cgsbob | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major|

[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #461: v.db.update crashes with updating shapefile connected with v.external

2009-04-14 Thread GRASS GIS
#461: v.db.update crashes with updating shapefile connected with v.external ---+ Reporter: msieczka | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: defect| Status: new Priority:

[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #73: r.out.gdal tiff output does not work

2009-04-14 Thread GRASS GIS
#73: r.out.gdal tiff output does not work --+- Reporter: helena | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical | Milestone:

[GRASS-dev] resize raster

2009-04-14 Thread Quentin Page
hello, I search the function which cut a raster part according to limits given by a vector (polygon). These two features are within the same projection. thanks a lot ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org

[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #552: add vector map layer in layer manager doesn't show any paramter window

2009-04-14 Thread GRASS GIS
#552: add vector map layer in layer manager doesn't show any paramter window --+- Reporter: pinzonef | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: defect| Status: new Priority:

[GRASS-dev] i.rectify still chokes on @mapset

2009-04-14 Thread Michael Barton
One of my students is testing the GRASSRC4 windows release. Apparently, i.rectify still raises and error if the maps in the group file have the mapset specification (m...@mapset). I thought this was fixed. We can try to strip the mapset specifier out in the GUI, but I thought that all

Re: [GRASS-dev] resize raster

2009-04-14 Thread Vincent Bain
Hi Quentin, If your vector contains a single polygon, I would do it this way : * v.to.rast (with the option type=area) * then assign the result to a mask with r.mask * finally run r.mapcalc on your raster with a simple identity (outrast=inrast) Le mardi 14 avril 2009 à 17:43 +0200, Quentin

Re: [GRASS-dev] i.rectify still chokes on @mapset

2009-04-14 Thread Markus Neteler
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Michael Barton michael.bar...@asu.edu wrote: One of my students is testing the GRASSRC4 windows release. Apparently, i.rectify still raises and error if the maps in the group file have the mapset specification (m...@mapset). I thought this was fixed. We can try

[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #552: add vector map layer in layer manager doesn't show any paramter window

2009-04-14 Thread GRASS GIS
#552: add vector map layer in layer manager doesn't show any paramter window ---+ Reporter: pinzonef | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: defect| Status: new

Re: [GRASS-dev] i.rectify still chokes on @mapset

2009-04-14 Thread Markus Neteler
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Michael Barton michael.bar...@asu.edu wrote: One of my students is testing the GRASSRC4 windows release. Apparently, i.rectify still raises and error if the maps in the group file have

Re: [GRASS-dev] i.rectify still chokes on @mapset

2009-04-14 Thread Michael Barton
On Apr 14, 2009, at 2:46 PM, Markus Neteler wrote: On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Michael Barton michael.bar...@asu.edu wrote: One of my students is testing the GRASSRC4 windows release. Apparently, i.rectify

[GRASS-dev] Re: [SoC] Proposal for wxGUI layout modifications

2009-04-14 Thread Hamish
Michael Barton wrote: Actually, I think what (I hope) was envisioned was not a true MDI--which has lost considerable popularity--but attaching the layer manager to the display window. Ideally, this could be done by docking or undocking. That said, Markus and I had some offline discussions

Re: [GRASS-dev] man/Makefile - include/Make/Man.make ?

2009-04-14 Thread Glynn Clements
Markus Neteler wrote: Could  man/Makefile be rewritten to include/Make/Man.make ? What would be the point? The point of including *.make files is that you can have a common set of rules which are included in multiple Makefiles. Given that only man/Makefile would be using those