Hello Glynn, 2009/8/15 Glynn Clements <gl...@gclements.plus.com>
> > Hamish wrote: > > > As for including LGPL code in the main trunk I personally don't have a > > problem with that as it reflects the upstream license/author's wishes, > > is new code, and is used as a library. By my reading the RFC2 doc nor > > 'g.version -c' & the COPYING file need any adjustment to cover this. > > But a formal decision on that may be a matter for the PSC. > > > > As long as everything in the lib/ccmath/ dir falls under the same (GPL > > compatible) license and the LGPL.txt file is placed in that dir I'd be > > happy. > > If it's being included in the main GRASS tree, it would be simpler to > relicense it as GPL. So we have to convince the author Daniel A. Atkinson to relicense the ccmath library as GPL code? The only email address i have found is: dan...@aol.com. I personally prefer to keep the LGPL license for ccmath. > > > The main thing is to ensure that each file has a header stating that > it is licensed under the LGPL. In the absence of such a header, we > can't reasonably assume that any additions to the code are licensed > under the LGPL. I will ensure this. Best regards Soeren > > > -- > Glynn Clements <gl...@gclements.plus.com> >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
