Hi All,
i'm tring to use Grass 7.0 but i have some build problems.
The fist arrive during thue grass build on the command :
r.colors :
-
Started compilation: Wed Oct 14 11:27:16 CEST 2009
--
Errors in:
/usr/local/src/grass_trunk/raster/r.colors
--
In case of errors
#788: r.out.gdal and nodata
-+--
Reporter: frankie | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.4.0
Hi,
I am Mohammed Rashad K.M. I had developed a DataCatalog for GRASS GIS using
wxpython GUI. I had got the idea from the grass GUI wiki. some sample
screenshots of the dataCatalog is uploaded.
you can visit the link below to view the screens. Even though my coding is
not comepleted, I am sending
Michael Barton wrote:
I'm working on the GUI location manager and have run into a couple of
irregularities in a couple of the projections parameters files. I'm
sending this to the list instead of keeping it in the location wizard
track ticket because they are a more general issue that
Markus Metz wrote:
I tried to add to svn add-ons new module but I did it probably wrong.
In raster directory I created new dir:
svn add r.stream.del
svn ci -m New module r.stream.del
You can also do
svn mkdir https://svn.osgeo.org/grass/grass-addons/raster/r.stream.del
#783: r.watershed fails on wingrass
---+
Reporter: hamish| Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
#175: v.to.rast labelcol= SegFaults and ignored
--+-
Reporter: hamish | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major|
#175: v.to.rast labelcol= SegFaults and ignored
--+-
Reporter: hamish | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major|
#788: r.out.gdal and nodata
--+-
Reporter: frankie | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.4.0
Hi,
2009/10/14 Massimo Di Stefano massimodisa...@yahoo.it:
[...]
ERROR: Cannot find either convert or pnmtopng
install 'convert' (from imagemagick package) or 'pnmtopng'.
Martin
--
Martin Landa landa.martin gmail.com * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa
Thanks much for this information. I've got a start on rebuilding the
UTM page to show parameters of all projections. I've got the usual
formatting hangups (currently can't figure out how to clear the page
if you want to look at another projection), but it is moving along.
I agree that we
Thanks much Glynn. This is helpful. There is no urgency on the
parameters without descriptions right now since nothing seems to use
these, but we can't use them in the future without some kind of
description to parse.
Michael
On Oct 14, 2009, at 6:22 AM, Glynn Clements wrote:
was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-gui/attachments/20091014/53bb8f94/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:54:59 +0200
From: Jaros?aw Jasiewicz jar...@amu.edu.pl
Subject: Re: [GRASS-GUI] DataCatalog
To: Mohammed Rashad
#175: v.to.rast labelcol= SegFaults and ignored
--+-
Reporter: hamish | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major|
#175: v.to.rast labelcol= SegFaults and ignored
--+-
Reporter: hamish | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major|
#783: r.watershed fails on wingrass
---+
Reporter: hamish| Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Hi All.
from a gdal-dev list+irc discussion,
the old patch no longer work on the up-to date gdal trunk.
the old patch was applied in the trunk plus modification to have the
gdal-grass plug-in
working on grass version 7 and = 7.
but that sophistication has been broken by a recent change
#789: g.region option to expand the computational region of about some pixels?
---+
Reporter: nikos | Owner:
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: enhancement
#320: the ``default region'' term is somewhat misleading
--+-
Reporter: 1gray| Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor|
#323: Consistency in adjectives used for GRASS' geographic region
--+-
Reporter: nikos| Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor
#320: the ``default region'' term is somewhat misleading
--+-
Reporter: 1gray| Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor|
#789: g.region option to expand the computational region of about some pixels?
--+-
Reporter: nikos| Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: enhancement | Status: new
#175: v.to.rast labelcol= SegFaults and ignored
--+-
Reporter: hamish | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: defect | Status: reopened
Priority: normal |
#783: r.watershed fails on wingrass
---+
Reporter: hamish| Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Michael wrote:
I've got a start on rebuilding the UTM page to show
parameters of all projections.
u, could you explain that more? inner UTM terms may be interesting
on the summary page, but beyond that the user just cares about zone 12
North + datum choice(s). For UTM the projection will
On Oct 14, 2009, at 10:22 PM, Hamish wrote:
u, could you explain that more? inner UTM terms may be interesting
on the summary page, but beyond that the user just cares about zone
12
North + datum choice(s). For UTM the projection will always be TM of
course, and other terms will be
26 matches
Mail list logo
