Thank you Glynn for those nice explanations
Yann
On 13 October 2010 16:27, Glynn Clements wrote:
>
> Yann Chemin wrote:
>
>> some confusion you may clarify.
>>
>> Looking into some v6 to v7 coding translation, how would you test for
>> readability of raster cell header in v7
>>
>>
>>
>>
Yann Chemin wrote:
> some confusion you may clarify.
>
> Looking into some v6 to v7 coding translation, how would you test for
> readability of raster cell header in v7
>
>
>
> mapset = G_find_cell2(band_in, "");
> if (mapset == NULL) {
> G_warning(_("Raster
Hello list,
some confusion you may clarify.
Looking into some v6 to v7 coding translation, how would you test for
readability of raster cell header in v7
mapset = G_find_cell2(band_in, "");
if (mapset == NULL) {
G_warning(_("Raster map <%s> not found"),
Hello
Helmut I'm not sure if I got it (I think I'm a bit lost on those links).
Could you better explain what you meant with them?
About the:
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/releasebranch_6_4/mswindows/GRASS-Installer.nsi#L628
What exacly d you meant with this? Because this is fro
Hello list,
I would like to include i.landsat.toar in GRASS7.
I believe this will bring the necessary complement to i.atcorr and the
subsequent i.albedo/i.vi/etc that are part of the chain processing of
Landsat.
Is there anybody maintaining it these days?
I would be happy to do the necessary to in
#1191: make install gives sed error in r43810
---+
Reporter: cgsbob| Owner: grass-...@…
Type: defect| Status: reopened
Priority: normal| Milesto
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 14:24 +0200, Martin Landa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> wxGUI in GRASS 6.5 is mostly in sync with GRASS 7.0. In opposite wxGUI
> in GRASS 6.4.0 has been frozen due to long RC stage for one year and
> more. I am starting to think to backport wxGUI from GRASS 6.5 to
> 6.4.1. What do you thi
Hi,
wxGUI in GRASS 6.5 is mostly in sync with GRASS 7.0. In opposite wxGUI
in GRASS 6.4.0 has been frozen due to long RC stage for one year and
more. I am starting to think to backport wxGUI from GRASS 6.5 to
6.4.1. What do you think about that? It will bring new GUI features to
6.4.1 and make liv
#1045: strange behaviour in v.net.path
--+-
Reporter: manuele | Owner: grass-...@…
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: n
On 12/10/10 05:20, Hamish wrote:
Hi,
any objections to backporting r.proj -p and -g flags? it makes it so you
don't need the v.in.region + v.proj tricks and makes the work flow a lot
easier (no need to change GRASS sessions).
I would welcome this very much, but I would also like to ask : why n
#584: vector directed graph library BUG2
---+
Reporter: mmetz | Owner: grass-...@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal
11 matches
Mail list logo