It could be proposed as a "anyone can help GRASS" on first launch of the
GUI. Opt-in and weekly upload of anonymous aggregated stats will be sent to
grass.osgeo.org for modules stats analysis.
grass.osgeo.org could have a weekly pigure/chart with the top 10 most used
modules last week.
... strect
A useful idea if users actually participated.
Michael
C. Michael Barton
Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity
Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change
Arizona State University
voice: 480-965-6262 (SHESC), 480-727-9746 (CSDC)
fax:
Would it be possible to have modules usage statistics aggregated in GRASS
and periodically reported to a website for anonymous stats? Ubuntu asks you
to participate in such usage survey.
It would be opt-in only, but would certainly tell GRASS community which
modules are actually used most.
just a
I agree with Helena. It is very good when working with many projects and
students--and demo-ing GRASS to other organizations--to have a very complete
tool set. On the other hand, it would help to have some established guidelines
about what is best moved to trunk and what things might be best mov
On 31 October 2012 02:25, Helena Mitasova wrote:
> I agree with Glynn and Ben,
> when working with students on 50+ different projects it is really great to
> have everything
> in one package and not to worry about which additional tool to install and
> whether it will work with the latest release
Hi,
I'm with Helena, Glynn and Ben,
I think that having many module in one package is better for users that do
not have to take care of anything else.
If I have GRASS installed, I can find anything there (without need
of searching for additional modules that are not found in the manuals!).
And the
#1777: reference to 6.4.2 in
---+
Reporter: jeir | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.4.3
Hi,
2012/10/30 Helena Mitasova :
> I agree with Glynn and Ben,
> when working with students on 50+ different projects it is really great to
> have everything
> in one package and not to worry about which additional tool to install and
> whether it will work with the latest release.
> We used to
I agree with Glynn and Ben,
when working with students on 50+ different projects it is really great to have
everything
in one package and not to worry about which additional tool to install and
whether it will work with the latest release.
We used to have the code split into core, alpha and sever
#1736: wxNVIZ volume display crashes Mac
---+
Reporter: cmbarton | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone: 6.4.3
#1776: Python error by startup
+---
Reporter: pvanbosgeo | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.4.3
#1736: wxNVIZ volume display crashes Mac
---+
Reporter: cmbarton | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone: 6.4.3
OK. I'll try to test as soon as possible, though hopefully others with greater
familiarity with the r.li modules can help in this. Without r.li.setup, all
other r.li modules are useless.
Related to this, the r.le modules appear in the menu but are greyed out. If
they are no longer to be distrib
Martin Landa wrote:
> > as a regular user of MODIS, I would like to call other MODIS users to
> > express interest to include r.modis into GRASS 7 SVN.
>
> we cannot extend number of modules in trunk forever. Probably some
> modules should be reviewed and moved to addons.
Why?
Keeping modules
Maybe g.extension (or some other module) could work like R's CRAN Task Views.
For those who don't know what CRAN Task Views are, take a look at
http://decisionstats.com/2011/03/28/using-views-in-r-and-comparing-functions-across-multiple-packages/
-Bob
Robert Moskovitz
California Geological Sur
Hi Soeren,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Sören Gebbert
wrote:
> Hi Anna,
> you have implemented a great tool! I was able to visualize two space
> time raster datasets with different temporal granularity (mixing year
> and month) synchronously. :)
> This is really cool.
Thanks to your tempora
Hi Martin,
It would be good to return modules that are less frequently used to add-ons.
Yann
--
Yann Chemin
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Il giorno 30/ott/2012 09:44, "Markus Neteler" ha
scritto:
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Michael Barton
wrote:
> > Why is r.li.setup unavailable in GRASS 7? It is greyed out in the menu
and
> > cannot be launched from the command line. Without this, you cannot use
the
> > other r.li modules
>* Exporting animation as mp4 or similar :)
Recommend webm or ogg theora to avoid patent entanglements.
Doug
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Sören Gebbert wrote:
> Hi Anna,
> you have implemented a great tool! I was able to visualize two space
> time raster datasets with different temporal gr
Hi Anna,
you have implemented a great tool! I was able to visualize two space
time raster datasets with different temporal granularity (mixing year
and month) synchronously. :)
This is really cool.
Having such a great tool raises many wishes that could be implemented
in addition. :)
Here just a f
Hi,
2012/10/30 Benjamin Ducke :
> What's the difference between having 300 or 500
> modules in the base distribution? GRASS has the
> file layout required to scale up to this size
> easily, and each individual module is small and
> lean. Even if we were to triple the number of
> modules in the bas
I would like to express a different point of view.
One of the nice things about GRASS in its current
form is that one download will get you hundreds
of modules without having to worry about installing
add-ons.
What's the difference between having 300 or 500
modules in the base distribution? GRAS
Hi Martin,
I have no worries, since I do load modules directly. I am worried about the
learning curve for Windows-bound students in need of MODIS images, but not
comfortable with GRASS GIS yet.
But this is an old story coming back,
I am all for reducing significantly the number of modules in GRA
#1773: Map selection expand broken
--+-
Reporter: cmbarton | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone: 7.0.0
#1773: Map selection expand broken
---+
Reporter: cmbarton | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: 7.0.0
Hi,
2012/10/30 Yann Chemin :
> as a regular user of MODIS, I would like to call other MODIS users to
> express interest to include r.modis into GRASS 7 SVN.
we cannot extend number of modules in trunk forever. Probably some
modules should be reviewed and moved to addons.
Do you have any problem
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Michael Barton wrote:
> Why is r.li.setup unavailable in GRASS 7? It is greyed out in the menu and
> cannot be launched from the command line. Without this, you cannot use the
> other r.li modules. But I also see tickets that indicate r.li.setup has been
> happenin
#1775: v.surf.rst does not respect mask
-+--
Reporter: cmbarton | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.0.0
28 matches
Mail list logo
