Dear all,
Today I uploaded a new GRASS 7 addon to SVN.
The Python-script „v.lidar.mcc“ aims at removing vegetation returns from LiDAR
point-clouds. It is a modified implementation if Evans Hudak`s (2007)
multiscale curvature classification (mcc) algorith.
Compared to the original, the GRASS
I am trying to use r.stats to print out a text file with x and y
coordinates as well as the area (or cell count). However, it seems any
choice is mutually exclusive. If I choose to print the grid coordinates and
to print the area, what I get is the coordinates with the category number.
If I select
I have the following function (to calculate cell area)
PI=3.1415926536
RES=0.0008333
R=6371007
r.mapcalc test3 = (sin(y()+$RES/2) - sin(y()-$RES/2)) * ($RES * $PI/180) *
$R^2
This will give me a wrong results, apparently because R is an integer
value. If I adapt the formula:
r.mapcalc test3 =
On 24/09/14 10:00, Paulo van Breugel wrote:
I am trying to use r.stats to print out a text file with x and y
coordinates as well as the area (or cell count). However, it seems any
choice is mutually exclusive. If I choose to print the grid coordinates
and to print the area, what I get is the
Paulo van Breugel:
I am trying to use r.stats to print out a text file with x and y
coordinates as well as the area (or cell count). However, it seems
any
choice is mutually exclusive. If I choose to print the grid
coordinates and
to print the area, what I get is the coordinates with the
Thanks for this contribution. I look forward to trying this when I have
time.
Mark
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Blumentrath, Stefan
stefan.blumentr...@nina.no wrote:
Dear all,
Today I uploaded a new GRASS 7 addon to SVN.
The Python-script „v.lidar.mcc“ aims at removing vegetation
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Moritz Lennert
mlenn...@club.worldonline.be wrote:
On 24/09/14 10:00, Paulo van Breugel wrote:
I am trying to use r.stats to print out a text file with x and y
coordinates as well as the area (or cell count). However, it seems any
choice is mutually
On 24/09/14 14:08, Paulo van Breugel wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Moritz Lennert
It thus does not make sense to provide coordinates for count or
area: which coordinates would you use if you have cells with the
same category all over your map ?
It makes sense if each
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Moritz Lennert
mlenn...@club.worldonline.be wrote:
On 24/09/14 14:08, Paulo van Breugel wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Moritz Lennert
It thus does not make sense to provide coordinates for count or
area: which coordinates would you use if
#2431: vector_what fails with multiple layer/cat
-+--
Reporter: artegion | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major|
#2432: g.list -f ignores mapset parameter
-+--
Reporter: peifer | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Hi,
I like changes in the style of the manual which have been recently
applied in GRASS 7.1 [1]. Only one thing which I am not sure is a
width on the page, it seems to be too narrow [1] to me compared to
GRASS 7.0 manual [2]. What about changing width to `width of page` - 2
* `width of toc`?
2014-09-24 20:42 GMT+02:00 Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com:
width on the page, it seems to be too narrow [1] to me compared to
look eg. at [1] where some of examples overflow the border.
Martin
[1] http://grass.osgeo.org/grass71/manuals/v.in.ascii.html
--
Martin Landa *
Hi Martin, I'm glad you like it. I was just discussing this with Markus who
requested the narrower fixed layout, so I don't want to write it again, so
here is the conversation. About the examples, we can add horizontal scroll
bar, example is here:
Paulo van Breugel wrote:
I have the following function (to calculate cell area)
PI=3.1415926536
RES=0.0008333
R=6371007
r.mapcalc test3 = (sin(y()+$RES/2) - sin(y()-$RES/2)) * ($RES * $PI/180) *
$R^2
This will give me a wrong results, apparently because R is an integer
value. If I
I just learned that using upper case characters for a GRASS 7 module option
means that g.parser will not recognize it. That is for module. “r.foo with
options “Abc” and “def”, the command
r.foo Abc=1 def=2
will return an error Abd=1 is not a valid option.
GRASS 6 does not produce an error in
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Michael Barton michael.bar...@asu.edu
wrote:
I just learned that using upper case characters for a GRASS 7 module
option means that g.parser will not recognize it. That is for module.
“r.foo with options “Abc” and “def”, the command
r.foo Abc=1 def=2
The issue is not about whether upper or lower case (or other characters) are
good programming form or not in on language or another. This varies from
context to context.
The issue is about a change in behavior of how GRASS scripts and modules are
parsed between GRASS 6 and 7 that can cause
18 matches
Mail list logo