Hi Devs,
Just looking at what GRASS does in the spectral domain, as a planetary
scientist asked me how far GRASS could go to replace ENVI capabilities in that
matter.
i.spec.unmix
i.spec.sam
i.spectral
is there any other tool that directly relate to spectral analysis?
Thx
Yann
PS: would ther
#2609: Upload raster category labels to a point file
-+--
Reporter: pvanbosgeo | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milest
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Moritz Lennert
wrote:
> On 04/03/15 09:19, Martin Landa wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2015-03-03 9:31 GMT+01:00 Moritz Lennert :
>>>
>>> "A final, concerted bug squashing effort by all developers of no more
>>> than one week. During that same time the release announcement
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Paulo van Breugel
wrote:
> Hi Anna,
>
> OK, I did some further testing in another mapset, and it seems it was a
> problem with the region settings. After setting the region using 'set
> computational region from selected map(s)' the region wasn't set correctly.
> I
#2608: Launching Python script on Windows fails with missing freeze_support
-+--
Reporter: marisn | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority:
Hi Anna,
OK, I did some further testing in another mapset, and it seems it was a
problem with the region settings. After setting the region using 'set
computational region from selected map(s)' the region wasn't set correctly.
It seems to work fine now though. Sorry for the buzz.
O
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Paulo van Breugel
wrote:
> When editing a raster using the raster digitizer, the resolution is
> changes (lower resolution) after saving the edits. Is this the intended
> behaviour, and if so, what is determining the resolution?
>
> My prefered behaviour would be
#2608: Launching Python script on Windows fails with missing freeze_support
-+--
Reporter: marisn | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority:
When editing a raster using the raster digitizer, the resolution is changes
(lower resolution) after saving the edits. Is this the intended behaviour,
and if so, what is determining the resolution?
My prefered behaviour would be that the resolution used follows that of the
region settings.
___
#2607: Python shell hint results in OSError error(None): None
-+--
Reporter: marisn | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal |
On 04/03/15 09:19, Martin Landa wrote:
Hi,
2015-03-03 9:31 GMT+01:00 Moritz Lennert :
"A final, concerted bug squashing effort by all developers of no more than
one week. During that same time the release announcement is drafted. If an
important bug is discovered for which a fix needs some more
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Moritz Lennert
wrote:
> On 04/03/15 15:14, Pietro wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I'm looking for a GRASS module that unify the geometries and the
>> values, If I have a configuration like:
>>
>> geo features | cat | id | A | B
>> geofeature1 => cat1, id1, a1, b
On 04/03/15 15:14, Pietro wrote:
Dear all,
I'm looking for a GRASS module that unify the geometries and the
values, If I have a configuration like:
geo features | cat | id | A | B
geofeature1 => cat1, id1, a1, b1
geofeature2 => cat2, id1, a2, b2
geofeature3 => cat3, id2, a3, b3
geofeatur
Dear all,
I'm looking for a GRASS module that unify the geometries and the
values, If I have a configuration like:
geo features | cat | id | A | B
geofeature1 => cat1, id1, a1, b1
geofeature2 => cat2, id1, a2, b2
geofeature3 => cat3, id2, a3, b3
geofeature4 => cat4, id2, a4, b4
geofeature5
Sorry for not responding earlier, I missed somehow this mail.
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Glynn Clements
wrote:
> Is there any reason to retain lib/sites as a separate library, rather
> than simply merging it into v.in.sites? There isn't a ctypes wrapper
> for it, so I'm reasonably sure it i
Hi,
2015-03-03 9:31 GMT+01:00 Moritz Lennert :
> "A final, concerted bug squashing effort by all developers of no more than
> one week. During that same time the release announcement is drafted. If an
> important bug is discovered for which a fix needs some more testing, an RC3
> can exceptionally
16 matches
Mail list logo
