#2676: r.neighbors on large rasters
--+---
Reporter: dnewcomb | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.0.1
Component: Default |Version: svn-trunk
#2676: r.neighbors on large rasters
---+-
Reporter: dnewcomb | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: enhancement| Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.0.1
Component:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Pietro wrote:
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Martin Landa
wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2015-05-13 8:03 GMT+02:00 Pietro :
> >> #% description: Name of vector map with interested segments of rivers
> >
> > <- label
>
> Therefore I should use label i
Hi Martin,
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Martin Landa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2015-05-13 8:03 GMT+02:00 Pietro :
>> #% description: Name of vector map with interested segments of rivers
>
> <- label
Therefore I should use label instead of description, something like:
{{{
#!/usr/bin/env python
# --
Hi devs,
I found a strange r.cross behaviour, the output includes a random 0
category without any label information. Here an example in the NC sample
location:
g.version -rg
> version=7.0.0
> date=2015
> revision=0
> build_date=2015-01-24
> build_platform=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> libgis_
Hi,
2015-05-13 8:03 GMT+02:00 Pietro :
> #% description: Name of vector map with interested segments of rivers
<- label
> As you can see the description of the parameter add the default
> description set in G_OPT_V_INPUT and in a new line the description
> added manually in the definition of the
* Pietro [2015-05-13 08:03:04 +0200]:
> Dear all,
>
> I found an inconsistency of behaviors between G_OPT_R_INPUT and
> G_OPT_V_INPUT, here the test code:
>
> {{{
> #!/usr/bin/env python
> # -- coding: utf-8 --
> #%module
> #% description: Test
> #% keywords: test
> #%end
> #%option G_OPT_R_INP
#2480: v.class.ml: ImportError: No module named training_extraction
--+
Reporter: mlennert | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.0.0
Component: Addons
