OK.. Tried to work around this limitation by adding spaces and $HOME is now
expanded into the location directory. Hmm... I kind of see why we're doing
this. Maybe, better to fix load_env()?
Huidae
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 8:59 PM Huidae Cho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently, .grass7/bashrc is partially
Hi,
Currently, .grass7/bashrc is partially broken. This file is read by two
functions in the startup script: load_env() and *_startup() (
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3462). Commenting out export lines in
.grass7/bashrc doesn't work because load_env() splits each line twice (once
by space a
Hi,
btw, we have revisited the Dockerfiles and now have all in one repo
with different tags:
https://hub.docker.com/r/mundialis/grass-py3-pdal/tags
- based on Alpine, Debian, Ubuntu as base images
- stable 7.8.dev and master 7.9.dev
- PDAL included
- PROJ and GDAL versions depend on the base imag
Hi,
FWIW:
https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/releases/tag/7.8.1RC1
Best
Markus
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 1:20 PM Andreas Neumann wrote:
>
> Excellent. Thanks all for your efforts! It is appreciated a lot!
>
> Andreas
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lis
#3896: d.legend: error when displaying raster legend
--+-
Reporter: veroandreo | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.8.1
Component: Display |Version:
Hi devs,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:25 AM Markus Neteler wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 8:46 AM Markus Metz
> > Yes, GRASS will then work with GDAL 3 + PROJ 6 (just finished some local
> > tests, looks all fine).
>
> Excellent, thanks for the hard work!
>
> Since the QGIS project is eagerly wa
Hi,
I had the same problem last time I used i.fusion.hpf for pansharpening a
SPOT image (6m to 1.5m). Question is in my view if the resulting values
mean anything (i.e., they can be used for estimation of spectral indices)
or it is just for visual purposes? Sorry for my ignorance, but I haven't
fo
#3916: r.ml.learn: Add more model evaluation output
--+-
Reporter: sbl | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Addons |Version: unspecified
Res
Dear devs,
Recently, I made a PR to https://github.com/zarch/grass-session/pull/14 in
order to add some new features and fix issues with newer GRASS versions in
grass-session.
Amongst others, it should now be possible to choose a specific GRASS GIS
version for each session if several versions a
Hi,
On Tue, 29. Oct 2019 at 10:01:26 +0100, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
> > Just to be sure, you merge and then RC1?
For PROJ 6.2.1 and GDAL 3.0.2 there are also currently RCs…
Jürgen
--
Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31
Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rhein
On 2019-10-29 10:01, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
On Tue, 29. Oct 2019 at 13:07:47 +1000, Nyall Dawson wrote:
1. Wait for GRASS to update and release (doesn't seem a great option
-- the whole geo stack is being delayed by this (e.g. gdal 3 missed
the ubuntu 19.10 release)
GDAL 3 is not in Ubuntu 1
Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote
> thanks for the merge!
>
> see https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2019-October/093436.html
>
>
> ##
> see comment in:
>
> https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/136#issuecomment-547353924
>
> --
> should we now merge also this PR? or do we hav
Markus Neteler wrote
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 8:46 AM Markus Metz
> <
> markus.metz.giswork@
> > wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 9:18 PM Helmut Kudrnovsky <
> hellik@
> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote
>> > >>I would like to get PROJ 6 support into G 7.8.1, can we get RC1 out
>> >e
>I am now preparing GRASS 7.8.1RC1.
see comment in:
https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/136#issuecomment-547353924
--
should we now merge also this PR? or do we have to adapt OSGeo4W env first?
-
-
best regards
Helmut
--
Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Gras
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 8:46 AM Markus Metz
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 9:18 PM Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote:
> >
> > Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote
> > >>I would like to get PROJ 6 support into G 7.8.1, can we get RC1 out >end
> > of
> > > this week?
> > >
> > > Will grass support then also GDAL 3?
>
>
Dear all,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 10:11 AM Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
>
> Hi Nyall,
>
> On Tue, 29. Oct 2019 at 13:07:47 +1000, Nyall Dawson wrote:
> > I wonder if there's anything the QGIS project can do to assist here.
> > The options as I see them:
> >
> > 1. Wait for GRASS to update and release
Hi Nyall,
On Tue, 29. Oct 2019 at 13:07:47 +1000, Nyall Dawson wrote:
> I wonder if there's anything the QGIS project can do to assist here.
> The options as I see them:
>
> 1. Wait for GRASS to update and release (doesn't seem a great option
> -- the whole geo stack is being delayed by this (e.g
#3921: GUI fails to start if rc contains missing mapset
--+-
Reporter: marisn | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.8.1
Component: wxGUI|Version: svn-
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 9:18 PM Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote:
>
> Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote
> >>I would like to get PROJ 6 support into G 7.8.1, can we get RC1 out >end
> of
> > this week?
> >
> > Will grass support then also GDAL 3?
Yes, GRASS will then work with GDAL 3 + PROJ 6 (just finished some loc
19 matches
Mail list logo