Re: [GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #498: r.sun2 out of sync / broken svn history

2009-04-07 Thread Markus Neteler
Hoping for feedback... r.sun still needs a fix for LatLong. Markus -- Forwarded message -- From: Markus Neteler Date: Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 9:09 AM Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #498: r.sun2 out of sync / broken svn history To: Hamish On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:40 AM

Re: [GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #498: r.sun2 out of sync / broken svn history

2009-03-02 Thread Markus Neteler
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:10 AM, Hamish wrote: > > Markus: >> Thinking about this: how 'bout diffing and update the old >> directory and remove the new r.sun2 directory (which doesn't >> have the history) > > oh, that's what I thought you meant to do; fine idea. > > Can we now say that all bugfixes

Re: [GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #498: r.sun2 out of sync / broken svn history

2009-03-01 Thread Hamish
Markus: > Thinking about this: how 'bout diffing and update the old > directory and remove the new r.sun2 directory (which doesn't > have the history) oh, that's what I thought you meant to do; fine idea. Can we now say that all bugfixes have been cross-ported & we won't lose any? Hamish

Re: [GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #498: r.sun2 out of sync / broken svn history

2009-03-01 Thread Markus Neteler
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Hamish wrote: > > Markus wrote: >> Well, back to tech-talk: >> should we create a diff to r.sun, delete r.sun2 >> from SVN, svn copy r.sun to r.sun2 and apply the >> diff to carry over the history? > > I think we should, after we are happy that they are in sync. Ha

Re: [GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #498: r.sun2 out of sync / broken svn history

2009-02-20 Thread Markus Neteler
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Hamish wrote: > > Markus wrote: >> Well, back to tech-talk: >> should we create a diff to r.sun, delete r.sun2 >> from SVN, svn copy r.sun to r.sun2 and apply the >> diff to carry over the history? > > I think we should, after we are happy that they are in sync. Ha

Re: [GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #498: r.sun2 out of sync / broken svn history

2009-02-20 Thread Hamish
Markus wrote: > Well, back to tech-talk: > should we create a diff to r.sun, delete r.sun2 > from SVN, svn copy r.sun to r.sun2 and apply the > diff to carry over the history? I think we should, after we are happy that they are in sync. Having two copies there is just asking for trouble, and that

Re: [GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #498: r.sun2 out of sync / broken svn history

2009-02-19 Thread Michael Barton
On Feb 19, 2009, at 3:50 AM, wrote: Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:50:02 +0100 From: Markus Neteler Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #498: r.sun2 out of sync / broken svn history To: GRASS developers list Message-ID: <86782b610902190250j3dfcbb91qc534e75a7

Re: [GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #498: r.sun2 out of sync / broken svn history

2009-02-19 Thread Markus Neteler
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 5:04 AM, GRASS GIS wrote: > #498: r.sun2 out of sync / broken svn history > > attack of the out-of-sync clones & another "svn copy" related tragedy. > (granted it was added to svn some months ago, when we were all young about > these things) Defense (Changelog analysis)

[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #498: r.sun2 out of sync / broken svn history

2009-02-18 Thread GRASS GIS
#498: r.sun2 out of sync / broken svn history +--- Reporter: hamish | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 6.4.0