Hi Pietro, dear developers,
i think we should stay with ctypes as this is already supported by GRASS.
Also the benchmark results are looking very promising regarding
efficiency to me.
Best regards
Soeren
2012/6/19 Pietro peter.z...@gmail.com:
Dear all,
I'm going on with the GSoC, and I'm
Dear all,
I'm going on with the GSoC, and I'm using ctypes to call the Grass's
function, but I found this comment:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/5686873
(from a cython developer) that it has instilled in me a doubt that
using Cython (http://cython.org/) could make pygrass more
flexible/extensible.
