2008/7/2 Hamish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I notice in ps/ps.map/paper.h that A0 is slightly different than other
> published values. Actually other values found on the 'net are all over
> the place.
[...]
> any requests on what sizes we should include? currently for ISO sizes we
> only define
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Moritz Lennert wrote:
On 02/07/08 09:07, Hamish wrote:
[...]
any requests on what sizes we should include? currently for ISO sizes we
only define A0-A4.
I've never seen these sizes with decimals (my usual sources: [1],[2]), so I
actually think that they are defined round
On 02.07.2008 10:46, Moritz Lennert wrote:
On 02/07/08 09:07, Hamish wrote:
Before I commit the above values, does anyone see a problem in my script
or know if the sizes are actually defined by ISO as "rounded" values in
some unit, versus the mathematical approach that I've taken?
any requests
On 02/07/08 09:07, Hamish wrote:
Hi,
I notice in ps/ps.map/paper.h that A0 is slightly different than other
published values. Actually other values found on the 'net are all over
the place.
In an effort to "do it right" I've recalculated them as follows, from the
fundamental A0=1m^2; W:H = 1:sq
Hi,
I notice in ps/ps.map/paper.h that A0 is slightly different than other
published values. Actually other values found on the 'net are all over
the place.
In an effort to "do it right" I've recalculated them as follows, from the
fundamental A0=1m^2; W:H = 1:sqrt(2) definition:
size|width_mm|he
