Hi,
Why can't you just present two different modules ? I know that they have
common code, but is it such a problem to have redundancy in addons ?
yes, the main reason is the code redundancy [1].
In any case, if these modules work well, I would plead for including them
into the main
Hi,
2014-12-12 12:17 GMT+01:00 Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com:
If you really have to chose, I would probably agree with Vaclav and prefer
v.surf.nnbathy.
I would agree. I will rename module right now. Martin
I split the modules to `raster/r.surf.nnbathy` (*) and
Hi Vaclav,
2014-12-09 20:27 GMT+01:00 Vaclav Petras wenzesl...@gmail.com:
The addons manual pages are still not built for some addons. I haven't
checked all but I checked the recent ones. The page claims to be updated
daily and the date I see in page info actually is Mon 08 Dec 2014 09:05:01
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Vaclav,
2014-12-09 20:27 GMT+01:00 Vaclav Petras wenzesl...@gmail.com:
The addons manual pages are still not built for some addons. I haven't
checked all but I checked the recent ones. The page claims to be
Thanks for the Martin.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
http://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/addons/
The addons manual pages are still not built for some addons. I haven't
checked all but I checked the recent ones. The page claims to be updated
Hi,
2014-12-07 19:26 GMT+01:00 Vaclav Petras wenzesl...@gmail.com:
The logs about building addons are not updated. I'm also not sure about
addons manual pages. I think that i.theilsen from yesterday should be
visible but it is not. Is this related? I though that it is not. The logs
are recent
Hi Martin and Markus,
The logs about building addons are not updated. I'm also not sure about
addons manual pages. I think that i.theilsen from yesterday should be
visible but it is not. Is this related? I though that it is not. The logs
are recent just the overall log is outdated.
Vaclav
