On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Vaclav Petras wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Markus Neteler wrote:
>>
>> > I am not a developer, just something I wondered; why not having one
>> > permanent address for the manual, which always reflects the
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Markus Neteler wrote:
> > I am not a developer, just something I wondered; why not having one
> > permanent address for the manual, which always reflects the latest stable
> > release, and if needed, from there add links to older versions?
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Paulo van Breugel
wrote:
> On 18-08-16 10:22, Markus Neteler wrote:
>> Hi devs,
right:
s+devs+all+
>> still our (Google) ranking of the G7 manual is fairly bad (ideas
>> welcome how to fix that).
>
> I am not a developer, just something
On 18-08-16 10:22, Markus Neteler wrote:
Hi devs,
still our (Google) ranking of the G7 manual is fairly bad (ideas
welcome how to fix that).
I am not a developer, just something I wondered; why not having one
permanent address for the manual, which always reflects the latest
stable release,
Hi devs,
still our (Google) ranking of the G7 manual is fairly bad (ideas
welcome how to fix that).
For the time being I have added a HTML injection to the cronjob which
creates the G6 manual pages.
Each page now contains a box, pointing the user to G7.
Markus