Markus Neteler wrote:
Ok, thanks for the explanations.
The only remaining issue (for me) is that 2011 is indicated
which quite not reflects the current state. But of course that's
not so important...
probably the best thing we can do is adjust the wording to make
it clear to non-programmers
Markus Neteler wrote:
from a current question in the grass-gui list:
...GIS Library Revision is 45934 (2011-4-13)...
I wonder if we need to keep this info in g.version. I find it rather
confusing. The SVN revision is the better (and relevant) information.
Can we (please) ditch this GIS
Ok, thanks for the explanations.
The only remaining issue (for me) is that 2011 is indicated which
quite not reflects the current state. But of course that's not so
important...
Markus
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Hi,
from a current question in the grass-gui list:
...GIS Library Revision is 45934 (2011-4-13)...
I wonder if we need to keep this info in g.version. I find it rather
confusing. The SVN revision is the better (and relevant) information.
Can we (please) ditch this GIS Library Revision output?
Markus N wrote:
from a current question in the grass-gui list:
...GIS Library Revision is 45934 (2011-4-13)...
I wonder if we need to keep this info in g.version. I find
it rather confusing. The SVN revision is the better (and
relevant) information.
Can we (please) ditch this GIS Library
