Hi all,
So I've been getting into all sorts of strife with hard-coded limits
on filename lengths in GRASS. Not hard-coded in a sense that they are
enforced (that wouldn't be an issue, because then I'd know about it!),
but in the sense that there are all these fixed buffer limits in
modules which d
Hi Joel,
[sorry about yahoo's broken linewrap..]
Joel Pitt wrote:
> So I've been getting into all sorts of strife with
> hard-coded limits
> on filename lengths in GRASS. Not hard-coded in a sense
> that they are
> enforced (that wouldn't be an issue, because then I'd know
> about it!),
> but in
Hamish wrote:
> as you found, on top of that, grass 6 titles (cats+hist) are
> going to be limited to RECORD_LEN chars. an update of the meta-
> data backend remains a major TODO for grass 7.
FWIW, I've re-written this in r42695.
The fields of "struct History" are now dynamically allocated, rat
> Hamish wrote:
> > as you found, on top of that, grass 6 titles (cats+hist) are
> > going to be limited to RECORD_LEN chars. an update of the meta-
> > data backend remains a major TODO for grass 7.
Glynn:
> FWIW, I've re-written this in r42695.
>
> The fields of "struct History" are now dynamica
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Hamish wrote:
>> Hamish wrote:
>> > as you found, on top of that, grass 6 titles (cats+hist) are
>> > going to be limited to RECORD_LEN chars. an update of the meta-
>> > data backend remains a major TODO for grass 7.
> Glynn:
>> FWIW, I've re-written this in r42695
