On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Moritz Lennert
wrote:
> Le Thu, 4 May 2017 19:26:12 +0200, > Markus Neteler a
> écrit :
...
>> Would you mind to add a note on how to interprete the "peak values of
>> variance" in the examples?
>> Say, what to deduce from it in terms of the size of detectable
>>
Le Thu, 4 May 2017 19:26:12 +0200,
Markus Neteler a écrit :
> Hi Moritz,
>
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Moritz Lennert
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > FYI, I uploaded a simple new addon, i.variance [1], which
> > calculates local variance in an image for successively degraded
> > resolution
Hi Moritz,
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Moritz Lennert
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> FYI, I uploaded a simple new addon, i.variance [1], which calculates local
> variance in an image for successively degraded resolution in order to detect
> whether there are certain scales corresponding to specific, w
Hi all,
FYI, I uploaded a simple new addon, i.variance [1], which calculates
local variance in an image for successively degraded resolution in order
to detect whether there are certain scales corresponding to specific,
well-represented objects in that image. It is based on [2].
Enjoy !
Mor
