2011/9/30 Hamish :
> sounds good to me. see grass64/scripts/r.cats for a model of
> leaving behind a link to the old name, if that's necessary.
> (is the 6.x version scriptable?)
done in r48567-r48571, candidate for backport to relbr64 - recorded as [1].
Martin
[1] http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ti
I will have to update some assignments if the name is changed, but it should
not be too much.
It will be better to rename it now rather than later, so +1 for the new name
Helena
On Sep 29, 2011, at 11:32 PM, Hamish wrote:
> Martin wrote:
>> I would prefer to rename nviz_cmd to m.nviz.image al
Martin wrote:
> I would prefer to rename nviz_cmd to m.nviz.image also in
> GRASS6. It's quite new module which is not used by normal users,
who among us are normal users? :-)
(but seriously, I think one of the great draws of grass is that
it lets you do (or adapt the code to) odd-ball tasks whic
Hi,
2011/9/29 Helena Mitasova :
> is nviz_cmd supposed to work in winGRASS6.4.2 (it works on mac and linux)
> or is the Windows support planned only for winGRASS7 with m.nviz.image
it should work (not tested), I would prefer to rename nviz_cmd to
m.nviz.image also in GRASS6. It's quite new module
Martin,
is nviz_cmd supposed to work in winGRASS6.4.2 (it works on mac and linux)
or is the Windows support planned only for winGRASS7 with m.nviz.image
thank you,
Helena
On Sep 28, 2011, at 6:59 AM, Martin Landa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/8/28 Hamish :
>>> d.* should only be used for modules whi
