Re: [GRASS-dev] r.resample.rst behavior does not match manual

2015-09-10 Thread Markus Neteler
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Blumentrath, Stefan wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > > The second sentence you cite from the manual seems indeed a bit imprecise. > > It should probably say something like: > > “The extent of all resulting raster maps is taken from the settings of the > current region (w

Re: [GRASS-dev] r.resample.rst behavior does not match manual

2015-09-10 Thread Vaclav Petras
On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Michael Barton wrote: > Thanks for all the responses and fixes. I should have some time in the > next week to look at these. > Please see also my comments in "r.in.lidar: height aboveground" where I say: r.resamp.rst should honor the resolution of the data since

Re: [GRASS-dev] r.resample.rst behavior does not match manual

2015-09-06 Thread Michael Barton
Thanks for all the responses and fixes. I should have some time in the next week to look at these. Michael C. Michael Barton Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change Head, Graduate Faculty in Compl

Re: [GRASS-dev] r.resample.rst behavior does not match manual

2015-09-06 Thread Paulo van Breugel
On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Markus Neteler wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Michael Barton > wrote: > > Thanks for the clarification Stefan. > > > > It sounds like, unlike other resampling commands (unless they, too, are > in > > error), r.resample.rst needs to be run at the resolut

Re: [GRASS-dev] r.resample.rst behavior does not match manual

2015-09-06 Thread Markus Neteler
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Michael Barton wrote: > Thanks for the clarification Stefan. > > It sounds like, unlike other resampling commands (unless they, too, are in > error), r.resample.rst needs to be run at the resolution of the original > map, not the output map. Yes. It has been imple

Re: [GRASS-dev] r.resample.rst behavior does not match manual

2015-08-30 Thread Michael Barton
.osgeo.org>> Subject: [GRASS-dev] r.resample.rst behavior does not match manual The r.resample.rst manual states… " Reinterpolation (resampling) is done to higher, same or lower resolution specified by the ew_res and ns_res parameters.” The very next sentence states... "All resulti

Re: [GRASS-dev] r.resample.rst behavior does not match manual

2015-08-30 Thread Blumentrath, Stefan
2015 04:03 To: GRASS developers grass-developers Subject: [GRASS-dev] r.resample.rst behavior does not match manual The r.resample.rst manual states… " Reinterpolation (resampling) is done to higher, same or lower resolution specified by the ew_res and ns_res parameters.” The very

[GRASS-dev] r.resample.rst behavior does not match manual

2015-08-29 Thread Michael Barton
The r.resample.rst manual states… " Reinterpolation (resampling) is done to higher, same or lower resolution specified by the ew_res and ns_res parameters.” The very next sentence states... "All resulting raster maps are created using the settings of the current region (which may be different