Re: [GRASS-dev] r34362, r34366

2008-11-20 Thread Martin Landa
Hi, 2008/11/20 Hamish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] >> But maybe you are right (in terms of g6.x), if you prefer I will revert >> this change. > > for g6.x I prefer that it be reverted so the interactive functionality > is not (effectively) lost. done in r34407. Martin -- Martin Landa * http:/

Re: [GRASS-dev] r34362, r34366

2008-11-20 Thread Hamish
Hamish: > > re. https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/34366 > > > > fine for grass7, but please don't disable > valid+working functionality in > > devbr6. if you want to launch a gui window for it use > "r.recode --ui". Martin: > well, I prefer to disable GRASS_UI_TERM in general (where is poss

Re: [GRASS-dev] r34362, r34366

2008-11-19 Thread Martin Landa
Hi, 2008/11/19 Hamish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > re. https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/34366 > > fine for grass7, but please don't disable valid+working functionality in > devbr6. if you want to launch a gui window for it use "r.recode --ui". well, I prefer to disable GRASS_UI_TERM in general (

[GRASS-dev] r34362, r34366

2008-11-19 Thread Hamish
Hi, re. area of https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/34362 is it really a good idea for us to be telling people to use "rm -rf" in a main help page?? For one thing it's not portable, and for another new users are reading that- I'd suggest for them to learn to do dangerous things on their own t