Hamish wrote:
should clean-room author aim for MIT/X (full integration into
GDAL release) or LGPL (more in line with the spirit of our
project; continues as a GDAL plugin) ?
I suggest MIT.
--
Glynn Clements gl...@gclements.plus.com
___
grass-dev
Hi all,
first step towards rasterlib in GRASS 7 has been done [1]. Let me
suggest the second one. The file layout should be consolidated.
Currently vectors are located in 'vector' directory, 3d rasters in
'grid3' (or 'g3cell') - should be 'raster3d'.
I would vote for similar approach for raster
Martin Landa wrote:
first step towards rasterlib in GRASS 7 has been done [1]. Let me
suggest the second one. The file layout should be consolidated.
Currently vectors are located in 'vector' directory, 3d rasters in
'grid3' (or 'g3cell') - should be 'raster3d'.
I would vote for similar
Martin wrote:
The file layout should be consolidated.
Currently vectors are located in 'vector' directory,
I would vote for similar approach for raster files in
GRASS 7. So
raster/name/cats
raster/name/cell
raster/name/cellhd
raster/name/cell_misc
raster/name/colr
