On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Hamish wrote:
> ML:
>>> BTW, should be devbr6 renamed to 6.5? 6.4.x is used for relbr64.
> MN:
>> Ah, you mean include/version[.in]? It could be done but
>> then all the web stuff/cronjobs needs to be updated which
>> is rather painful.
>
> if it breaks all the cro
ML:
>> BTW, should be devbr6 renamed to 6.5? 6.4.x is used for relbr64.
MN:
> Ah, you mean include/version[.in]? It could be done but
> then all the web stuff/cronjobs needs to be updated which
> is rather painful.
if it breaks all the cron jobs we can switch develbranch_6's VERSION back
to 6.4.sv
Hi,
2009/1/15 Markus Neteler :
[...]
>> I know, but on the other hand, it should be done;-) BTW, Hamish already
>> started.
>
> mhh, maybe things should be sync'ed a bit... perhaps I overlooked
> the related email(s).
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/35410
Martin
--
Martin Landa * htt
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Martin Landa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2009/1/15 Markus Neteler :
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Martin Landa wrote:
>>> BTW, should be devbr6 renamed to 6.5? 6.4.x is used for relbr64.
>>
>> Looking at
>> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/
>> - deve
Hi,
2009/1/15 Markus Neteler :
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Martin Landa wrote:
>> BTW, should be devbr6 renamed to 6.5? 6.4.x is used for relbr64.
>
> Looking at
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/
> - develbranch_6
> - ...
> - releasebranch_6_4
>
> I think it looks ok? I
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Martin Landa wrote:
> BTW, should be devbr6 renamed to 6.5? 6.4.x is used for relbr64.
Looking at
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/
- develbranch_6
- ...
- releasebranch_6_4
I think it looks ok? I don't find it confusing as it is...
Maybe I don'
Hi,
2009/1/14 Michael Barton :
>>> I can see it 'optional' tab.
>>
>> hm, quite hidden,
huh, you cannot see 'optional' tab??
Martin
--
Martin Landa * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa *
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.
On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:41 AM, Martin Landa wrote:
2009/1/14 Martin Landa :
Hi.
2009/1/14 Michael Barton :
I just tried v.buffer in GRASS 6.4 (develbranch) and 7 (trunk).
The vitally
important "distance=" argument is missing from the GUI.
I can see it 'optional' tab.
hm, quite hidden,
2009/1/14 Martin Landa :
> Hi.
>
> 2009/1/14 Michael Barton :
>> I just tried v.buffer in GRASS 6.4 (develbranch) and 7 (trunk). The vitally
>> important "distance=" argument is missing from the GUI.
>
> I can see it 'optional' tab.
hm, quite hidden, changed in r35405 (devbr6). I will backport to
Hi.
2009/1/14 Michael Barton :
> I just tried v.buffer in GRASS 6.4 (develbranch) and 7 (trunk). The vitally
> important "distance=" argument is missing from the GUI.
I can see it 'optional' tab.
Martin
--
Martin Landa * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa *
___
I just tried v.buffer in GRASS 6.4 (develbranch) and 7 (trunk). The
vitally important "distance=" argument is missing from the GUI.
Michael
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
11 matches
Mail list logo