After the recent Vectlib changes in GRASS 7, here new tests:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Markus Metz
wrote:
> Markus Neteler wrote:
>> GRASS 6.5.svn:
>> time v.in.ogr usr_urb.shp out=tmp
>> ...
>> 4020.05user 76.72system 1:14:33elapsed 91%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
>> 0maxresident)k
>> 298216inp
Markus Neteler wrote:
Some comments:
It now spends its time in (as you will know).
Break boundaries: ...
and
Building areas...
Yes, that's unchanged and behaves as before. Break boundaries can be
made faster with boundary splitting.
and then after having created the temporary topology an
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Markus Neteler wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Markus Metz
> wrote:
...
usr_urb.shp is of 126MB size.
> Here my tests:
>
> GRASS 6.5.svn:
> time v.in.ogr usr_urb.shp out=tmp
> ...
> 78095 input polygons
> Total area: 6.267569e+09 (78095 areas)
> Ove
Markus Neteler wrote:
Here my tests:
GRASS 6.5.svn:
time v.in.ogr usr_urb.shp out=tmp
...
4020.05user 76.72system 1:14:33elapsed 91%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
298216inputs+762008outputs (26major+213960minor)pagefaults 0swaps
GRASS 7.svn:
time v.in.ogr usr_urb.shp out=tmp
...
4137.7
Hi Markus,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Markus Metz
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have tried to make topology building in grass7 a bit faster, with limited
> success. Some functions are now a bit faster, but there are no drastic
> changes. Some other functions are now a bit slower, and there I woul
Hi all,
I have tried to make topology building in grass7 a bit faster, with
limited success. Some functions are now a bit faster, but there are no
drastic changes. Some other functions are now a bit slower, and there I
would like to know if there are objections against these changes.
The fir
