Re: [GRASS-dev] gmath/gpde Patch for grass6.5 and grass7

2009-09-02 Thread Soeren Gebbert
Hi, 2009/9/1 Soeren Gebbert soerengebb...@googlemail.com Hello Hamish, 2009/9/1 Hamish hamis...@yahoo.com Hi, I get two errors compiling 6.5svn. The first is because lib/gmath G_math_solvps() fails to return anything when it should return int. I think I fixed it with r38939, but

Re: [GRASS-dev] gmath/gpde Patch for grass6.5 and grass7

2009-09-01 Thread Hamish
Hi, I get two errors compiling 6.5svn. The first is because lib/gmath G_math_solvps() fails to return anything when it should return int. I think I fixed it with r38939, but please check to see if that is correct. https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/38939 The second is in

Re: [GRASS-dev] gmath/gpde Patch for grass6.5 and grass7

2009-09-01 Thread Soeren Gebbert
Hello Hamish, 2009/9/1 Hamish hamis...@yahoo.com Hi, I get two errors compiling 6.5svn. The first is because lib/gmath G_math_solvps() fails to return anything when it should return int. I think I fixed it with r38939, but please check to see if that is correct.

Re: [GRASS-dev] gmath/gpde Patch for grass6.5 and grass7

2009-08-28 Thread Soeren Gebbert
Dear developers, i have submitted the changes to the grass6 development branch (a patch for grass7 is in development). I have tested the patch several times and hope to not break anything in grass ... . You can test the patched grass version with the latest grass testsuite. It ships additional

Re: [GRASS-dev] gmath/gpde Patch for grass6.5 and grass7

2009-08-27 Thread Soeren Gebbert
Hello Hamish, i am sorry for the delay, i was very busy in the last days ... 2009/8/21 Hamish hamis...@yahoo.com Hamish wrote: by the way, I notice that we already ship the bwidget LGPL library trunk/lib/external/bwidget/ That is for Tcl which is redundant for grass 7, actually

Re: [GRASS-dev] gmath/gpde Patch for grass6.5 and grass7

2009-08-27 Thread Soeren Gebbert
Hello Glynn, i am sorry for the delay, the last days were very stressing for me ... 2009/8/21 Glynn Clements gl...@gclements.plus.com Soeren Gebbert wrote: 3.) I can place an ATTENTION.txt file in the ccmath library folder, which explains the licensing issue. You can't assume that

Re: [GRASS-dev] gmath/gpde Patch for grass6.5 and grass7

2009-08-27 Thread Glynn Clements
Soeren Gebbert wrote: Additionally i need to modify the lib/Makefile to put the directory external before the gmath library. But i think that is not a problem. It should be okay to put the external subdirectory first, as it shouldn't depend upon anything in GRASS. -- Glynn Clements

Re: [GRASS-dev] gmath/gpde Patch for grass6.5 and grass7

2009-08-27 Thread Hamish
Hamish wrote: I added a new lib/external/README.license file to explain things. AFAICT the SUBMITTING file and RFCs do not require adjustment. Soeren: Ok, i will put ccmath into lib/external together with the lgpl.license file and a README. actually there is nothing about the GPL or the

Re: [GRASS-dev] gmath/gpde Patch for grass6.5 and grass7

2009-08-21 Thread Hamish
Soeren: IMHO it may be difficult to re-license the ccmath library under the GPL ... . Hamish: why? Term 3 of the LGPL exists to describe exactly how to do that. Soeren: I am not concerned about the technical way, but about agreement of the original author of ccmath. Maybe i am wrong, but

Re: [GRASS-dev] gmath/gpde Patch for grass6.5 and grass7

2009-08-21 Thread Glynn Clements
Soeren Gebbert wrote: 3.) I can place an ATTENTION.txt file in the ccmath library folder, which explains the licensing issue. You can't assume that someone modifying the file will have viewed the contents of the folder. When I open a source file, it's often from grep or compilation output

Re: [GRASS-dev] gmath/gpde Patch for grass6.5 and grass7

2009-08-15 Thread Soeren Gebbert
Hello Glynn, 2009/8/15 Glynn Clements gl...@gclements.plus.com Hamish wrote: As for including LGPL code in the main trunk I personally don't have a problem with that as it reflects the upstream license/author's wishes, is new code, and is used as a library. By my reading the RFC2 doc

Re: [GRASS-dev] gmath/gpde Patch for grass6.5 and grass7

2009-08-14 Thread Hamish
Soeren wrote: if there are no objections against the changes and the new LGPL'd ccmath library? I have no comment either way on the technical side of the library changes beyond wondering if it will peacefully interact with the (mostly unused) existing --with-blas --with-lapack ./configure

Re: [GRASS-dev] gmath/gpde Patch for grass6.5 and grass7

2009-08-14 Thread Glynn Clements
Hamish wrote: As for including LGPL code in the main trunk I personally don't have a problem with that as it reflects the upstream license/author's wishes, is new code, and is used as a library. By my reading the RFC2 doc nor 'g.version -c' the COPYING file need any adjustment to cover

Re: [GRASS-dev] gmath/gpde Patch for grass6.5 and grass7

2009-08-13 Thread Hamish
Soeren wrote: In case the developers don't have any objections against the patch, i would like to see them commited to the svn repositories. Because i do not have write permissions on the osgeo grass reporitory, a developer with write acces must do this please. since you were already