On 2020-12-22 17:43, Michael Barton wrote:
I have no issue with either proposal. I did not respond because I
never saw a notification, even though I was looking for it.
If I counted correctly, it seems then that at this point we will need
one more PSC vote to approve proposal #2.
"GRASS GIS
I have no issue with either proposal. I did not respond because I never saw a
notification, even though I was looking for it.
Michael
__
C. Michael Barton
Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity
Director, Network for Computational Modeling in Social & Ecologi
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 9:26 AM Moritz Lennert
wrote:
> On 22/12/20 14:48, Markus Neteler wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 12:34 PM Chief Return Officer (CRO) - GRASS
> > GIS election 2020 wrote:
> >> On 2020-12-22 12:08, Markus Neteler wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:28 AM Moritz Lenn
On 22/12/20 14:48, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 12:34 PM Chief Return Officer (CRO) - GRASS
GIS election 2020 wrote:
On 2020-12-22 12:08, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:28 AM Moritz Lennert
...
But I agree with Hernán that we should have discussed this earl
I agree with #2 - the current PSC members should be nominated for re-election
by member(s) of the community- this is consistent with the OSGeo election
procedure.
We should also make sure that the nominee agrees to be nominated,
Helena
> On Dec 22, 2020, at 8:48 AM, Markus Neteler wrote:
>
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 12:34 PM Chief Return Officer (CRO) - GRASS
GIS election 2020 wrote:
> On 2020-12-22 12:08, Markus Neteler wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:28 AM Moritz Lennert
...
> >> But I agree with Hernán that we should have discussed this earlier.
> > Still it is not too late, s
On 2020-12-22 12:08, Markus Neteler wrote:
PSC, all,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:28 AM Moritz Lennert
wrote:
Am 22. Dezember 2020 09:24:17 MEZ schrieb "Chief Return Officer (CRO) - GRASS GIS election
2020" :
On 2020-12-21 22:20, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote:
wouldn't it be more transparent if cu
PSC, all,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:28 AM Moritz Lennert
wrote:
> Am 22. Dezember 2020 09:24:17 MEZ schrieb "Chief Return Officer (CRO) - GRASS
> GIS election 2020" :
> >On 2020-12-21 22:20, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote:
> >> wouldn't it be more transparent if current GRASS GIS PSC members are
> >>
On 2020-12-22 10:27, Moritz Lennert wrote:
Am 22. Dezember 2020 09:24:17 MEZ schrieb "Chief Return Officer (CRO) - GRASS GIS election
2020" :
On 2020-12-21 22:20, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote:
wouldn't it be more transparent if current GRASS GIS PSC members are
nominated for re-election in the sam
Am 22. Dezember 2020 09:24:17 MEZ schrieb "Chief Return Officer (CRO) - GRASS
GIS election 2020" :
>
>On 2020-12-21 22:20, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote:
>> wouldn't it be more transparent if current GRASS GIS PSC members are
>> nominated for re-election in the same way by the community as possible ne
On 2020-12-21 22:20, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote:
wouldn't it be more transparent if current GRASS GIS PSC members are
nominated for re-election in the same way by the community as possible new
candidates?
Thanks for your input, Helmut. The election wiki is not very clear about
this, it only stat
11 matches
Mail list logo
