Dear PSC list,
regarding SVN access to GRASS main SVN.
I agree to 'GRASS RFC 2: Legal aspects of code contributions'.
sincerely yours,
Yann
--
Yann Chemin
International Rice Research Institute
Office: http://www.irri.org/gis
Perso: http://www.freewebs.c
ed.
> happy hacking, Yann!
>
> Markus
>
> [1]
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/HowToContribute#SettingupthenewSVNwriteaccessafteracceptance
>
--
Yann Chemin
International Rice Research Institute
Office: http://www.irri.org/gis
Perso: http://www.freewebs.com/ychemin
_
commits.
>> I'll continue to respect the RFC2 that I read and accepted for the
>> GRASS-Addons access
>
> For sure I am +1 on this!
>
> Markus
> ___
> grass-psc mailing list
>
___
> grass-psc mailing list
> grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
>
>
--
Yann Chemin
___
grass-psc mailing list
grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
Good question Peter,
A similar thing happens to most conferences in Asia,
About 5 years of online life...
Worrying for research in general...
Yann
On Jan 18, 2013 3:11 PM, Peter Löwe wrote:
> Dear PSC,
>
> I just noticed that the Abstracts from the 2004 GRASS Users Conference in
> Bangkok have d
t;
> I read and accepted the document RFC2.
> My userid is kikapu.
>
>
> Thank you,
> Andrea Filipello
>
> ___
> grass-psc mailing list
> grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
>
--
er service :-)
>>
>> Best,
>> Markus
>> _______
>> grass-psc mailing list
>> grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
>
>
> ___
> grass-psc mailing list
> grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
>
--
Yann Chemin
Researcher@IWMI
Skype/FB: yann.chemin
___
grass-psc mailing list
grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
In favour of giving the devbranch6 a prune, I cannot remember when I used
grass6-dev last time...
+1 to remove devbranch6 after appropriate transfer of the needed to
releasebranch6.
Do we have a tentative time line to freeze Grass6 release branch (1 year?)
Yann
On 29 March 2014 11:34, Luca De
a big +1, welcome MaDi !
On 29 March 2014 22:19, Margherita Di Leo wrote:
> Dear PSC,
>
> in Vienna I've been working on manual pages cleanup on addons for their
> moving to trunk. Since the manual pages in trunk still need a good deal of
> clean up work, I would like to apply for SVN writing a
+1
On 30 March 2014 02:47, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote:
> Dear GRASS GIS PSC,
>
>
> margherita wrote
> > Dear Luca,
> >
> > thank you for raising this issue,
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Luca Delucchi <
>
> > lucadeluge@
>
> > > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> with the upcoming GRASS 7 release we
It looks like we all want to see version numbers move on a yearly basis
with periods of branching and periods of releasing...
Should we finalize this policy and implement it?
On 31 March 2014 23:54, Martin Landa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> 2014-03-31 20:07 GMT+02:00 Luca Delucchi :
> > On 31 March
I second MaDi for the "regularity rewards", we need long-term sponsors.
In Asia, there is this culture of Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum levels, it
applies to many things including event sponsorships. It can also be applied
to "regular" supporting sponsors for yearly donations. Without entering in
I am OK with the "former donors" page, with a (past years) date of funding
and a thank you note from GRASS.
On 1 April 2014 13:21, Margherita Di Leo wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Moritz Lennert <
> mlenn...@club.worldonline.be> wrote:
>
>> On 01/04/14 09:24, Margherita Di Leo w
Maybe we should have a call to PSC members?
+1 to start with Vaclav's proposal.
On 1 April 2014 20:50, Vaclav Petras wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Yann Chemin wrote:
>
>> Should we finalize this policy and implement it?
>
>
> Probably yes. Does PSC
I second Helena on quorum (min 51%), and also +1 for the 7 days suggestion
of MaDi.
On 7 April 2014 06:19, Helena Mitasova wrote:
> I agree with the voting rules with the following changes/comments:
>
> - change 4 business days to seven days to avoid confusion given that
> business days may be
+1
I also think we should stop GRASS 6 development
On 6 April 2014 19:01, Martin Landa wrote:
> 2014-04-06 15:16 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert :
>
> > Hamish, maybe you could be the official grass6 maintainer, managing the
> > whole grass6 development in the way you propose, i.e. any new development
16 matches
Mail list logo
