Hi,
2016-02-15 16:29 GMT+01:00 Luca Delucchi :
> (please remenber to use "svn cp" when move addons to main GRASS code)
small note: here should be 'svn mv'. Ma
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
___
gr
On 15 February 2016 at 16:21, Vaclav Petras wrote:
>
>
> I did it this way on purpose. The development cycle, code quality and code
> importance are different. Even the pool of developers is little bit
> different. Code stats for addons tell you nothing about the core GRASS
> moving forward or not
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Moritz Lennert wrote:
> Looking at the GRASS metrics at OpenHub used for OSGeo-Live (see below), I
> find it a pity that addons [1] is seperated from the main branches [2].
> Many new developers have been active recently, mostly coding addons.
>
> Any reason for th
Hi all,
Looking at the GRASS metrics at OpenHub used for OSGeo-Live (see below),
I find it a pity that addons [1] is seperated from the main branches
[2]. Many new developers have been active recently, mostly coding addons.
Any reason for this separation ? Would it be possible to merge them ?
