On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Paolo Cavallini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Clément Calenge ha scritto:
I programmed three new add-ons for the GRASS software, and thanks to the
kind help of Markus Neteler, they are now available on the GRASS Addons
repository.
Great news, and thanks a lot
Clément Calenge ha scritto:
Great news, and thanks a lot Clément!
It would be good to have all this in the main GRASS code, rather than as
addons: any objections on this?
Personally, I have no objection on this.
The problem is that I sustpect very few people take the additional
burden
Hamish:
I had considered a few alternatives:
- create a generic libxtf (LGPL?)
- GRASS support via a new C module (without a libxtf)
- postgis import tool
- sqlite import tool
- stand alone command line converter to csv or xml ascii format
(then shell script or python script
Hi,
I second the unclean deletion theory as I encountered this phenomenon before.
Also, when generalizing areas which are attached to each other, while the
overall appearance of the generalized borderlines is ok, more than 50 % of
the areas cease to exist, which needs further investigation:
Hi all,
Paul Kelly escribió:
I think I will delete the demo code from grass-addons shortly as the new
v.delaunay2 is now in grass-addons at
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass-addons/vector/v.delaunay2 and
ready for testing. Martin Pavlovsky, the SoC student working on this (Cc
to him
Hi grass-users,
I'm trying to run a supervised reclassification for an orthophoto
created using r.in.gdal and r.composite.
Before running i.class, i run i.group to create a subgroup which is
required by i.class. [The group containing 3 files .red, .green, .blue
had been previously created
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Paolo Cavallini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Clément Calenge ha scritto:
Great news, and thanks a lot Clément!
It would be good to have all this in the main GRASS code, rather than as
addons: any objections on this?
Personally, I have no objection on this.
The
Hi to All,
Can anyone give me some suggestion about importing World Wind DTM to GRASS?
Thanks to all
Regards
Edmondo
___
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Hi Silvia,
there have been a couple of fixes which probably didn't reach 6.3.0.
Could you try with 6.4.svn instead? There it will work.
Best
Markus
PS: See the list archives for older discussions on this.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Silvia Simoni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi grass-users,
thanks for the help,
maybe the solution will be useful: in various Linux distributions are starting
to ship with a version of the GNU C compiler which incorporates an extension
which implements protection for stack-smashing. In that case the Makefile
has to modified with
CFLAGS =
Hi Peter,
as an interim solution you might try an alternative to v.generalize that
I called v.simplify, available here:
http://markus.metz.giswork.googlepages.com/line_simplification.tar.gz
The module works for me so far, but I still discover strange behaviour
now and then. I developed that
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Markus Metz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I understand the source code v.generalize discards all
centroids and builds them anew at the end, area topology is not
maintained during simplification.
Dear all,
That is correct. The intention was that the
Hi there,
I have a bash script that processes a text file consisting of longitude
and latitude columns plus other columns with point data -- the script
imports the data and maps it. The script includes a parser-friendly
section so that the g.parser UI shows up if called with no arguments.
I
Luigi Ponti wrote:
I have a bash script that processes a text file consisting of longitude
and latitude columns plus other columns with point data -- the script
imports the data and maps it. The script includes a parser-friendly
section so that the g.parser UI shows up if called with no
I would like to test some of the GRASS addons for evaluation/inclusion
to main Grass code in (Mac and Ubuntu). I will probably use the
stable release as a test environment and of course North Carolina
dataset. Any specific test results I should submit?
This is the info I got from the wiki:
15 matches
Mail list logo