Hello all
I saw it here (
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-announce/2010-September/date.html)
that GRASS released a new stable version 6.4.0. The thing is: I cannot find
a windows binary of that exacly version. I only can find binaries from the
weekly updates and neither the code to compile
Luisa Peña wrote:
> Hello all
> I saw it here
> (http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-announce/2010-September/date.html)
> that GRASS released a new stable version 6.4.0. The thing is: I cannot find
> a windows binary of that exacly version. I only can find binaries from the
> weekly updates and
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Luisa Peña wrote:
> Hello all
> I saw it here
> (http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-announce/2010-September/date.html)
> that GRASS released a new stable version 6.4.0. The thing is: I cannot find
> a windows binary of that exacly version. I only can find bina
As a suggestion, the /download/index page doesn't add much to the download
experience and may be a little confusing. Perhaps the download link should go
directly to the /download/software.php page?
Stu
On Sep 10, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Markus Neteler wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Lu
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Stuart Edwards wrote:
> As a suggestion, the /download/index page doesn't add much to the download
> experience and may be a little confusing.
Mhh, there is only one relevant link as per-operating system provided at
http://grass.osgeo.org/download/
Why confusing
On Sep 10, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Markus Neteler wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Stuart Edwards
> wrote:
>> As a suggestion, the /download/index page doesn't add much to the download
>> experience and may be a little confusing.
>
> Mhh, there is only one relevant link as per-operating sy
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Stuart Edwards wrote:
>
> On Sep 10, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Markus Neteler wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Stuart Edwards
>> wrote:
>>> As a suggestion, the /download/index page doesn't add much to the download
>>> experience and may be a little confusin
Stuart wrote:
> The orange box in the center looks to a casual user as if
> it is the Mac download box - maybe we need to give some more
> prominence to the other binaries by name in this box?
the design of that page (for better or worse) is meant to be:
if viewed on Mac it should show a link the
