Hi Edmondo,
If I get your question correctly:
Resampling data with a spatial resolution of 90m might increase the
resolution of the DEM itself , but it will not increase the detail of the
data, only the number of pixels in your DEM. For instance, when you
downscale an image of 1 x 1 pixel by
reading skills
to
search and rescue volunteers. For visualization purposes, it is adequate
and
produces pretty pictures without stairsteps. For other purposes it is
probably
quite poor as I understand there are significant artifacts that can creep
in.
2009/1/20, Tom van der Putte t
Thanks! I set the height factor too high, so I didn't see anything :S
Tom
___
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Tom van der Putte
Sent: woensdag 14 januari 2009 10:23
To: 'Nikos Alexandris'
Cc: 'grass-user'
Subject: RE: [GRASS-user] r3.in.ascii - Difficulties understanfing format
Nikos,
Thanks very much for the 101 on rasters in Grass, helped me out big time. No
worries on the length
I was a little bit to hasty, forgot to mention that these are the region
settings,
projection: 0 (x,y)
zone: 0
north: 7
south: 0
west: 0
east: 7
top:11.
bottom: 0.
nsres: 1
nsres3: 1
ewres: 1
ewres3: 1
tbres: 1
rows:
Nikos,
Thanks very much for the 101 on rasters in Grass, helped me out big time. No
worries on the length of the answer, the more the better ;)
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Nikos Alexandris [mailto:nikos.alexand...@felis.uni-freiburg.de]
Sent: dinsdag 13 januari 2009 16:50
To:
. What I'm trying to
do is to understand al these parameters, so I can automate output from other
data sources. Can anybody help me with this problem? Thanks!
Tom van der Putte
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/r3.in.ascii---Difficulties-understanfing-format-tp2150996p2150996.html
