Martin Landa:
...
> >> > PS: Probably it would be reasonable to change configuration of ML
> >> > (send replay to the list instead to 'from') to avoid this mistake.
Markus Neteler:
> >> I would strongly advise against that (see '90s archive for some damages
> >> and OSGeo list archive too and oth
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Nikos Alexandris
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Martin Landa wrote:
> ...
>> > PS: Probably it would be reasonable to change configuration of ML
>> > (send replay to the list instead to 'from') to avoid this mistake.
>
> On Thursday 22 of April 2010 15:3
Hi,
2010/5/5 Nikos Alexandris :
[...]
> I just read about this past debate. So, it is always better to use the "Reply
> to Mailing-List" button (KMail here)?
>
> Pohhh... I am really sorry if I caused any problem since I've always been
> using the "Reply-to-All" for the list and the "Reply-to" f
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Martin Landa wrote:
...
> > PS: Probably it would be reasonable to change configuration of ML
> > (send replay to the list instead to 'from') to avoid this mistake.
On Thursday 22 of April 2010 15:36:37 Markus Neteler wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> I would strongly advi
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Martin Landa wrote:
...
> PS: Probably it would be reasonable to change configuration of ML
> (send replay to the list instead to 'from') to avoid this mistake.
Hi Martin,
I would strongly advise against that (see '90s archive for some damages
and OSGeo list arch
Hi,
2010/4/22 Martin Landa :
>>> > would have to do this:
>>> > grass.call(['whoami', 'input_file', 'output_file']) or
>>> > grass.call(['whoami input output_file'])
>
> if the syntax is 'cmd input output' then
>
> grass.call(['cmd', 'input', 'output'])
>
> see
>
> http://docs.python.org/library/s
Hi,
2010/4/22 Kim Besson :
>> > would have to do this:
>> > grass.call(['whoami', 'input_file', 'output_file']) or
>> > grass.call(['whoami input output_file'])
if the syntax is 'cmd input output' then
grass.call(['cmd', 'input', 'output'])
see
http://docs.python.org/library/subprocess.html#su
Here now at the ML for everyone :)
But which one of the two options is correct? The first one or the second
one? Or both are ok? (at least the second one is correct I suppose)
2010/4/22 Martin Landa
> Hi,
>
> {please keep discussion on ML}
>
> 2010/4/22 Kim Besson :
> > Bur for instance you sepa
Hi,
{please keep discussion on ML}
2010/4/22 Kim Besson :
> Bur for instance you separated two argument inside [ ]. This means that for
> instance If I need to call a external function and inser input and output I
> would have to do this:
> grass.call(['whoami', 'input_file', 'output_file']) or
>
Hi,
2010/4/22 Kim Besson :
> From http://download.osgeo.org/grass/grass6_progman/core_8py_source.html I
> see that besides the main argument there is **kwargs. What is this?
all defined arguments from Popen
http://download.osgeo.org/grass/grass6_progman/classpython_1_1core_1_1Popen.html
Martin
Hi,
2010/4/22 Kim Besson :
> I'm developing a small GRASS Python script but I will need to call an
> external executive. I already know where to put it (at $PATH) but i don't
> know how to call it from Python GRASS Script. How can I do this? (as an
> example it's helloWorld :) )
grass.call()
e.g
Hi
I'm developing a small GRASS Python script but I will need to call an
external executive. I already know where to put it (at $PATH) but i don't
know how to call it from Python GRASS Script. How can I do this? (as an
example it's helloWorld :) )
Thanks
Best regards
Kim
_
12 matches
Mail list logo
