Hi!
Sorry for taking so long.
I am not familiar with c and also I didn't really get the idea of your fix.
So there is something wrong with the total numbers of columns that
r.grow.distance counts?
Do you use your code as a kind of patch? I am using grass 6.4. I am also not
familiar with
fengel wrote:
I am not familiar with c and also I didn't really get the idea of your fix.
So there is something wrong with the total numbers of columns that
r.grow.distance counts?
Do you use your code as a kind of patch? I am using grass 6.4. I am also not
familiar with patching things.
Sorry for that. I hope this one's ok...
http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/file/n5107306/test_case.zip
test_case.zip
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/r-grow-distance-tp5100098p5107306.html
Sent from the Grass - Users mailing list archive at
fine in 7.0, broken in 6.x, this fixes it for me in 6.5:
Index: main.c
===
--- main.c (revision 42353)
+++ main.c (working copy)
@@ -287,6 +287,12 @@
check(col, 1, -1);
}
+ for (col = 0; col
Markus Metz wrote:
fine in 7.0, broken in 6.x, this fixes it for me in 6.5:
Right; this was done for 7.0 in r34429, but it was mixed up with
the addition of metric=geodesic, so it got overlooked.
--
Glynn Clements gl...@gclements.plus.com
___
Here ist the test case. I also added my result of r.grow.distance.
Falko
http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/file/n5102335/test_case.zip
test_case.zip
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/r-grow-distance-tp5100098p5102335.html
Sent from the Grass - Users
fengel wrote:
Here ist the test case. I also added my result of r.grow.distance.
That contains two maps: test_bool is empty (all cells are -32768),
while test_dist appears to be the output.
--
Glynn Clements gl...@gclements.plus.com
___
grass-user
