Re: [GRASS-user] r.external -o

2015-05-11 Thread Blumentrath, Stefan
-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Vaclav Petras Sent: 10. mai 2015 13:50 To: Radim Blazek Cc: grass-user Subject: Re: [GRASS-user] r.external -o Hi Radim, Short answer: No. I see that we should go through the documentation and check for working with these flags. -o just overrides

Re: [GRASS-user] r.external -o

2015-05-11 Thread Markus Neteler
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Vaclav Petras wenzesl...@gmail.com wrote: In other words, there is no on-the-fly reprojection, not even with r|v.external. However, when we consider recent addition to addons r|v.in.proj (r.in.gdal and v.in.ogr but with reprojection), r.external with

Re: [GRASS-user] r.external -o

2015-05-10 Thread Vaclav Petras
Hi Radim, Short answer: No. I see that we should go through the documentation and check for working with these flags. -o just overrides the projection consistency check and uses Location's projection (overrides dataset projection). It is used when definitions are the basically the same but there

[GRASS-user] r.external -o

2015-05-10 Thread Radim Blazek
Are there rasters in a projection different from current location, registered by r.external -o, reprojected on the fly when used? Radim ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user