] r.mapcalc appears to have changed behavior
To: Michael Barton michael.bar...@asu.edu
Cc: grass-user grass-user grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
Message-ID:
CAE=y9-tfacpyg_csap9w_5u47mdcu_phuxmaywurw2kevz0...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Thank you
detail :-)
From: Jim Mochel jim.mochel.hi...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [GRASS-user] r.mapcalc appears to have changed behavior
To: Michael Barton michael.bar...@asu.edu
Cc: grass-user grass-user grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
Message-ID:
CAE=y9
of the environment variables as you go. Help docs have
info on how to find the gory detail :-)
From: Jim Mochel jim.mochel.hi...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [GRASS-user] r.mapcalc appears to have changed behavior
To: Michael Barton michael.bar...@asu.edu
Cc: grass-user grass-user grass-user
wrote:
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:19:11 -0400
From: Jim Mochel jim.mochel.hi...@gmail.com
Subject: [GRASS-user] r.mapcalc appears to have changed behavior
To: grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
Message-ID:
CAE=Y9-Q7tFZ=cJ4TC6nceYA5B=
r9e7rrwzbvff_fybmntep...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type
I had made a number of scripts that worked fine in the 6.4.0 build 6 but
appear to have problems with the same code in later revisions:
The method used to take about 6-8 secs and produce about what you would
expect on the screen. Now the same calculation takes 0 seconds the file is
radically
Jim wrote:
I had made a number of scripts that worked fine in the 6.4.0 build 6
but appear to have problems with the same code in later revisions:
The method used to take about 6-8 secs and produce about what you would
expect on the screen. Now the same calculation takes 0 seconds the file
is
On Sep 27, 2011, at 11:50 PM, grass-user-requ...@lists.osgeo.org
grass-user-requ...@lists.osgeo.org wrote:
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:19:11 -0400
From: Jim Mochel jim.mochel.hi...@gmail.com
Subject: [GRASS-user] r.mapcalc appears to have changed behavior
To: grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
