Re: [graylog2] Adds graylog2 some fields itself?

2014-08-22 Thread ellyas ellyas
These fields are added by logstash, or more precisely the gelf-rb module used to format GELF messages. They are added because they are required fields according to the GELF 1.0 spec. Did you probably mean values of that fields, but not fields itself? I have tried to use Syslog UDP

Re: [graylog2] Adds graylog2 some fields itself?

2014-08-22 Thread Martin Schütte
On 22.08.2014 08:29, ellyas ellyas wrote: Did you probably mean values of that fields, but not fields itself? I Both, I guess. Because a field can only be present with a value in it. (We could argue whether the empty string is a valid value for a GELF facility, but that does not lead anywhere.

Re: [graylog2] Adds graylog2 some fields itself?

2014-08-22 Thread Jochen Schalanda
Hi! Am Freitag, 22. August 2014 11:11:12 UTC+2 schrieb Martin Schütte: have tried to use Syslog UDP input without logstash, and there are also these 2 fields facility = unknown and level = Invalid [-1] (values are different from GELF). Version is gone. That is another topic; BSD

[graylog2] Adds graylog2 some fields itself?

2014-08-11 Thread ellyas ellyas
Hi friends! I have simple system of graylog2, whos collect logs from pair of esxi hosts and a pair of windows server 2008 hosts. All log parse by logstash, and it cleans them from some useless fields, like @version. In the logstash out i have, for example, next: { message = 12345, @timestamp =